| Back to Home Page | Back
to Book Index |
Job Chapter
Twenty-six
Job 26
Chapter Contents
Job reproves Bildad. (1-4) Job acknowledges the power of
God. (5-14)
Commentary on Job 26:1-4
(Read Job 26:1-4)
Job derided Bildad's answer; his words were a mixture of
peevishness and self-preference. Bildad ought to have laid before Job the
consolations, rather than the terrors of the Almighty. Christ knows how to
speak what is proper for the weary, Isaiah 50:4; and his ministers should not grieve
those whom God would not have made sad. We are often disappointed in our
expectations from our friends who should comfort us; but the Comforter, the
Holy Ghost, never mistakes, nor fails of his end.
Commentary on Job 26:5-14
(Read Job 26:5-14)
Many striking instances are here given of the wisdom and
power of God, in the creation and preservation of the world. If we look about
us, to the earth and waters here below, we see his almighty power. If we
consider hell beneath, though out of our sight, yet we may conceive the
discoveries of God's power there. If we look up to heaven above, we see
displays of God's almighty power. By his Spirit, the eternal Spirit that moved
upon the face of the waters, the breath of his mouth, Psalm 33:6, he has not only made the heavens,
but beautified them. By redemption, all the other wonderful works of the Lord
are eclipsed; and we may draw near, and taste his grace, learn to love him, and
walk with delight in his ways. The ground of the controversy between Job and
the other disputants was, that they unjustly thought from his afflictions that
he must have been guilty of heinous crimes. They appear not to have duly
considered the evil and just desert of original sin; nor did they take into
account the gracious designs of God in purifying his people. Job also darkened
counsel by words without knowledge. But his views were more distinct. He does
not appear to have alleged his personal righteousness as the ground of his hope
towards God. Yet what he admitted in a general view of his case, he in effect
denied, while he complained of his sufferings as unmerited and severe; that
very complaint proving the necessity for their being sent, in order to his
being further humbled in the sight of God.
── Matthew Henry《Concise Commentary on Job》
Job 26
Verse 4
[4] To
whom hast thou uttered words? and whose spirit came from thee?
To whom —
For whose instruction hast thou uttered these things? For mine? Dost thou think
I do not know, that which the meanest persons are not unacquainted with; that
God is incomparably greater and better than his creatures? Whose spirit - Who
inspired thee with this profound discourse of thine?
Verse 5
[5] Dead things are formed from under the waters, and the inhabitants thereof.
Dead things —
Job having censured Bildad's discourse, proceeds to shew how little he needed
his information in that point. Here he shews that the power and providences of
God reaches not only to the things we see, but also to the invisible parts of
the world, not only to the heavens above and their inhabitants, and to men upon
earth, of which Bildad discoursed, chap. 25:2,3, but also to such persons or things as
are under the earth, or under the waters; which are out of our sight and reach;
yet not out of the ken of Divine providence. These words may be understood;
either, 1. of dead, or lifeless things, such as amber, pearl, coral, metals, or
other minerals, which are formed or brought forth; by the almighty power of
God, from under the waters; either in the bottom of the sea, or within the
earth, which is the lowest element, and in the scripture and other authors
spoken of as under the waters; this being observed as a remarkable work of
God's providence, that the waters of the sea, which are higher than the earth,
do not overwhelm it. Or, 2. of dead men, and of the worst of them, such as died
in their sins, and after death were condemned to farther miseries; for of such
this very word seems to be used, Proverbs 2:18; 9:18, who are here said to mourn or groan from
under the waters; from the lower parts of the earth, or from under those
subterranean waters, which are supposed to be within and under the earth; Psalms 33:7, and from under the inhabitants
thereof; either of the waters or of the earth, under which these waters are, or
with the other inhabitants thereof; of that place under the waters, namely, the
apostate spirits. So the sense is, that God's dominion is over all men, yea,
even the dead, and the worst of them, who though they would not own God, nor
his providence, while they lived, yet now are forced to acknowledge and feel
that power which they despised, and bitterly mourn under the sad effects of it
in their infernal habitations.
Verse 6
[6] Hell
is naked before him, and destruction hath no covering.
Hell — Is
in his presence, and under his providence. Hell itself, that place of utter
darkness, is not hid from his sight.
Destruction —
The place of destruction.
Verse 7
[7] He
stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon
nothing.
North —
The northern part of the heavens, which is put for the whole visible heaven,
because Job and his friends lived in a northern climate.
Nothing —
Upon no props or pillars, but his own power and providence.
Verse 9
[9] He holdeth back the face of his throne, and spreadeth his cloud upon it.
Holdeth —
From our view, that his glory may not dazzle our sight; he covereth it with a
cloud.
Throne —
The heaven of heavens, where he dwelleth.
Verse 11
[11] The
pillars of heaven tremble and are astonished at his reproof.
Pillars —
Perhaps the mountains which by their height and strength seem to reach and
support the heavens.
Astonished —
When God reproveth not them, but men by them, manifesting his displeasure by
thunders, or earthquakes.
Verse 14
[14] Lo,
these are parts of his ways: but how little a portion is heard of him? but the
thunder of his power who can understand?
Parts —
But small parcels, the outside and visible work.
Portion — Of
his power and wisdom, and providence.
His Power —
His mighty power, is aptly compared to thunder; in regard of its irresistible
force, and the terror which it causes to wicked men.
── John Wesley《Explanatory Notes on Job》
26 Chapter 26
Verses 1-14
But Job answered and said.
The transcendent greatness of God
I. God appears
incomprehensibly great in that portion of the universe that is brought under
human observation.
1. In connection with the world of disembodied spirits. “Dead things
are formed from under the waters and the inhabitants thereof. Hell is naked
before Him, and destruction hath no covering.”
2. In connection with this terraqueous globe. “He stretcheth out the
north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.” “It is evident
that the true figure of the earth had early engaged the attention of men, and
that occasionally the truth on this subject was before their minds, though it
was neither brought into a system nor sustained there by sufficient evidence to
make it an article of established belief.”
3. In connection with the starry universe. “By His Spirit He hath
garnished the heavens.” W. Herschell observed one hundred and sixteen thousand
stars pass the feeblest telescope in one quarter of an hour. But what are they?
Only a few drops to the ocean.
II. Insignificant
compared with those parts that are undiscovered in immensity. “Lo, these are
parts of His ways; but how little a portion is heard of Him? but the thunder of
His power who can understand?” Conclusion--
1. God’s greatness is not inconsistent with His attention to little
things.
2. God’s greatness is a vital subject for human thought. No subject
is so soul quickening. No subject is so humbling. (Homilist.)
Verses 1-14
But Job answered and said.
The transcendent greatness of God
I. God appears
incomprehensibly great in that portion of the universe that is brought under
human observation.
1. In connection with the world of disembodied spirits. “Dead things
are formed from under the waters and the inhabitants thereof. Hell is naked
before Him, and destruction hath no covering.”
2. In connection with this terraqueous globe. “He stretcheth out the
north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing.” “It is evident
that the true figure of the earth had early engaged the attention of men, and
that occasionally the truth on this subject was before their minds, though it
was neither brought into a system nor sustained there by sufficient evidence to
make it an article of established belief.”
3. In connection with the starry universe. “By His Spirit He hath
garnished the heavens.” W. Herschell observed one hundred and sixteen thousand
stars pass the feeblest telescope in one quarter of an hour. But what are they?
Only a few drops to the ocean.
II. Insignificant
compared with those parts that are undiscovered in immensity. “Lo, these are
parts of His ways; but how little a portion is heard of Him? but the thunder of
His power who can understand?” Conclusion--
1. God’s greatness is not inconsistent with His attention to little
things.
2. God’s greatness is a vital subject for human thought. No subject
is so soul quickening. No subject is so humbling. (Homilist.)
Verse 7
And hangeth the earth upon nothing.
The basis of the great realities
That is the startling and sublime conception of the sacred poet,
that the earth is sustained by impalpable and spiritual energies. But if you go
to the mythology of the Hindoo, you find that the earth rests on the back of an
elephant, and that the elephant stands on a tortoise! Now these two ways of
looking upon the stability of the earth penetrate the whole world of thought.
One great school of men finds that the basis of all things is spiritual;
another school finds that the basis of all things is material. Says one, the
life of the universe is supernatural; says the other, we can only trust a
tangible and material foundation. There in nature, as Job says, “He hangeth the
earth upon nothing.” He says that the basis of the world is invisible and
metaphysical; in a word we say in this place that the ultimate factor in nature
is spiritual; that out of the spiritual arose the visible; that the spiritual
holds the visible together; that the spiritual governs the visible and directs
it to some intelligent and noble goal. We say, not the sensational, not the
material, but the visible universe, hangs on nothing--on the unseen power of
the spiritual God. You go to some sceptical men today and ask them, What holds
this earth up? Why the imponderables, the ethers, the electricities, the
galvanisms, the gravitations--the elephant and tortoise! Go and ask them where
all the flowers came from. There was a time when there was not a single plant
on the planet. Where did they all come from? Well, they say, if you go back far
enough, you go back to a meteor stone which brought from other planets the
germs of vegetable life and beauty. If you go far enough back! Only you see, it
is not far enough back, it is the tortoise again! You go to the physiologist
and ask him where physical life, animal life comes from? He says, if you want
to explain animal life you must go back to--what? Odic forces, nervous energy!
Oh no, no, no, it is not far enough back; it is stopping once more at the
elephant and tortoise. And that is exactly what we in the Church refuse to do.
We won’t stay here, but we will go with the sublime philosophy of the text, to
the living God. And we believe that at last the things that are seen rest upon
the wise and eternal will of God, over all blessed forever. When these men say
that everything is to be explained by natural laws, natural causes, natural
sequences, we believe in natural laws, natural causes, natural sequences. But
before all changes, all states, all stages, we must find the Prime Mover, and,
as to all the rest, all the secondary causes, the will of God works through
them all, to His high and wonderful purpose. Go to the sceptical biologist
today, and he says, if you want to explain organisation you must go back, and you
will find that the organisation of today is based upon simple organisation in
the primitive epoch. In other words, you are to go back and to find the
microscopical tortoise in the primitive mud. You go to a sceptical astronomer
and ask what keeps the universe up. “Oh,” he says, “one star hangs upon
another.” Very good. And they all hang upon the topmost star. Everything is
dependent upon the central sun. In other words, your central sun is the
transfigured tortoise. Go to the sceptical geologist and say, “What do things
rest upon?” He says, “The earth you walk upon rests upon the carboniferous
epoch.” “Yes, and what does that rest upon? That rests upon the Devonian.”
“Very good; and what does that rest on?” He says, “That rests on the Silurian.”
“And what does that rest on?” “That rests on the cosmical dust.” A lively
tortoise! We hold the tortoise and the elephant are very good as far as they
go; but they do not go far enough. And you have never gone far enough, whilst
you keep to secondary causes, whilst you keep to intermediary forces. You can
never find rest for the intelligent soul, until at the back of the physical
universe, with its interdependencies and its evolutions, you find the God who
made and ruled it, and is bringing it through the ages to some wise and
magnificent consummation. I say, let us, in these days of materialism, keep
well this before the world--“In the beginning God,” the first cause, God in
whom all things are held together; God who directs everything to a noble and
adequate consummation. You know, where I live, the speculative builder has
turned up, and he has built a row of houses opposite to my modest cottage. I
had a grand time when I went to live there. I had the sky, and the sunrise, and
the sunset, and the procession of the clouds, and the colours of the spring,
and the glory of the summer. I never dared to speak of it, lest my landlord
should put up my rent! If he had made me pay for all that, he would have wanted
a fine fee. But in comes the speculative builder, and puts up this row of
horrid bricks and mortar. And now the only glimpse I get of the violet sky is
in a puddle in the street. I never see the splendour of the sunset, except a
stray gleam in a window pane. As for the growths of the summer, the only relics
I how see are two smutty, smutty growths in a little plot that they poetically
call my garden! They call it London Pride that grows there. But if London is
proud of it, it shows the humility of the metropolis! Now what I want yon to
see is this: that just as the bricks and mortar have shut out nature, so nature
herself may become so much dead brick and mortar to shut out the greater world
that is back of it. Men stop with the visible, and they forget the unseen and
eternal universe, of which this world is but a theatre of images and shadows.
Now find another illustration of the text in society. If God is the ultimate
factor in nature, God is once more the ultimate factor in society. “He hangeth
the earth upon nothing.” He hangeth civilisation upon nothing. Now there,
again, you find the objector comes in. He says, Oh, you believe everything
rests in society upon a spiritual basis. Yes. Well, I don’t; I believe that
society is built upon instincts, upon utilities, upon governments. The elephant
and tortoise again! What are the three great words in the world today touching
civilisation? “Liberty, equality, fraternity?” Let us drop that legend and take
up these which come nearer co the point--sympathy, righteousness, hope. Society
is held together, it advances by the power of these three words. If you come to
look at them, they are all metaphysical. Sympathy--What a power sympathy is in
civilisation! The home, society are held together by it. Go to the materialist,
and he says, Society is held together by hooks of steel. What are they? The
policeman’s handcuffs, that is it. How is society held together? By the
hangman’s noose. Coercion, penalties, punishments--society rests there! Society
does not rest there. One of the great factors is that wonderful thing you call
love that has been working obscurely in the world from the beginning to this
hour. Forbearance, unselfishness, disinterestedness, gratitude, love. Oh, says
the utilitarian, hang the earth upon the thick cart rope of coercion. He
hangeth civilisation upon the fine silken thread we call love. And today in
society, love plays the same part that gravitation plays in the physical
universe. Righteousness. What is righteousness? Oh, says the utilitarian,
righteousness is a coarse fibre,--self-interest. That is the sustaining force
of righteousness. What is the force which sustains righteousness? It is
spiritual. “God hangs the heavens upon the finest wires,” say the ancients; and
morality depends upon faith and love. If you want a guarantee for morality,
what is the great guarantee which the New Testament gives? That the love you
feel to the world’s Saviour will prompt your obedience to the world’s Lawgiver.
Hope. There is another great word that moves and sanctifies society. If it were
not for hope, the nation would wither, civilisation would wither. And the hope
of the world is at last the confidence of men in an unseen but a faithful God.
And so, in civilisation as in science, the great forces that mould, and
sustain, and inspire, and perfect, are not gross materialism and mean
utilities, but they are in fine threads, noble feelings, and these threads
sustain the whole fabric of civilisation. And therefore in the Church, you
know, we seem really nobody. If you get a statesman, he has got an army at his
back. If you get a magistrate, he has got a lot of policemen at his back. If
you get a merchant, you get the Bank of England at his back--more or less! But
we in the Church have no political mastery. When we lay down a law, we cannot
call in the policeman. We have none of the forces of bread and gold. What have
we got in the Church? Well, I say this, the Church is the master of the forces
that mould society, that is all. The Church is the master of those great
emotions of sympathy, of sentiment, of righteousness, of hope. Never you be
troubled because you think the Church has a somewhat isolated and spiritualised
and apparently uninfluential situation. It is the spiritual that governs
society. I must show you how the text is illustrated in the Church. “He hangeth
the earth upon nothing.” Religion--what is religion? Religion means a bond, a
spiritual bond, between my soul and my Maker, and my salvation hangs where the
earth hangeth and where salvation hangs, on the Word of God in Jesus Christ;
there and only there. You are wrong again, says the objector, and he begins to
call in the elephant and the tortoise. Says he, What about the Church? Your
salvation rests on the Church, its services, sacraments, its spiritualities.
Don’t you see it is resting (and I speak with great respectfulness) our
salvation upon the elephant and the tortoise, instead of going back to the
spiritual God and His truth, love, and grace, and these only? My salvation
depends upon my personal fellowship with my living Lord. He hangeth the earth,
not upon the coarse thread of historic continuity, but upon the fine thread of
the spiritual past. My salvation does not hang upon a connection with the
ceremonial Church. There they fix me up with the visible, mechanical,
ceremonial Church. It is like a man who believes the earth wants shoring up.
Not a bit of it. I can do with certain of these things and I can do without
them. I am not bound to the visible ceremonial Church. Hangs my salvation on
the simple Word in Jesus Christ, and there is the vital truth for you and for
me. “God is a Spirit, and they that worship Him must worship Him in spirit and
in truth, for He seeketh such to worship Him.” “He hangeth the earth upon
nothing,” and it hangs well. Fasten yourself to the same thread and you shall
not find that you will be confounded. (W. L. Watkinson.)
Verse 8
He bindeth up the waters in His thick clouds.
Water and its wonderful transportation by clouds
The average quantity of aqueous vapour, or water held in the air,
is estimated to be 54,460,000,000,000 tons. The annual amount of rainfall is
estimated to be 186,240 cubic miles. If this rain were at any one moment
equally spread over the land portion of the globe, it would cover all the
continents with water three feet deep. Reflect now that water in its natural
state is 773 times heavier than air. And now suppose that you had never heard
or conceived of the principle of evaporation, and that you were required to
lift up this vast mass of 54,460,000,000,000 tons of water one mile, two,
three, four or five miles high into the air, and keep it suspended there. Well,
what man, or all mankind combined cannot do, or begin to do, God did on that
second day of creation, and does daily. Water as vapour occupies 1600 times
larger space than water as liquid. Hence, water as vapour is lighter than air,
and naturally ascends. That is the whole secret. How manifold are the works of
God. (G. D. Boardman.)
Verse 9
He holdeth back the face of His throne, and spreadeth His cloud
upon it.
The cloud upon the throne
Aided by Divine revelation, the researches of man have done much
and well in tracking out the footprints of Deity, in exploring His hidden
works, and leading us through nature up to that God whose glory is thus dimly
shadowed forth, and upon whom nature depends for all its laws, its continuance
and well-being. But after all, there is still around the throne of God a cloud
so dense that it cannot be pierced by the keenest eye of the most assiduous
investigator, and defies all the daring powers of the most gifted intellect.
How insignificant do we appear in the presence of the Infinite, the
Incomprehensible!
I. The truth to be
illustrated. The figurative language of the text seems to have reference to the
mystery which surrounds the throne of God as the seat of His universal empire.
1. In reference to the kingdom of creation, it must be acknowledged
that the mind of man has discovered much that is vast and sublime. It has
discovered what are called the laws of gravitation. But who can define the
precise nature of this gravitation? Is it not a name given to something, the
effects of which are manifest, but whose real and essential nature is unknown?
We go to the patriarchal hills, and explore the bosom of the earth, and
discover further illustration of the text. There is something here which
baffles all man’s powers to explain. Look at that living mystery of all mysteries
which we carry about with us; consider the mechanism of the human frame, and
the moral constitution of our nature. Who can trace the connection that
subsists between mind and matter; how is it that the physical frame is subject
to the volitions of mind?
2. In reference to the kingdom of God’s moral government, and the
dispensations of an overruling providence. As a general rule, vice brings along
with it its own scourge, and virtue its own reward; yet in how many instances
are we staggered with perplexity, when we see the profane and the ungodly among
the most prosperous in temporal matters, whilst the man who fears God, and
pursues his honest avocation with persevering industry, is often bound round
with sorrow as with a garment, and disastrous events come upon him in quick
succession.
3. In reference to the kingdom of grace. At every step we find
ourselves encompassed with inscrutable mystery, whether’ we consider the
doctrines taught, the objects embraced, or the change produced.
II. The consolation
suggested. It is not one opposing power holding back the throne of another, and
spreading a cloud upon it with some vindictive design. It is the King Himself
holding back His own throne, and Himself covering it with a cloud. God is
seated upon the cloud-wrapped throne, not merely as universal Governor, but in
the more endearing character of a Father. All things are working together for
good under the superintendence of Him who sitteth upon the throne. These
considerations should tend to check the despondent repinings in which we are so
often disposed to indulge. The cloud is spread upon the throne now; but let us
trust God where we cannot trace Him; only let us live by faith in His Son; and
soon the cloud will pass away before our beatific vision; soon shall we see the
King in His beauty, on His throne dismantled of the cloud, smiting with a
Father’s warmest love. We shall then acknowledge with grateful hearts--He did
all things well. (W. J. Brock, A. B.)
Verse 14
Lo, these are parts of His ways.
The veil partly lifted
The least understood Being in the universe is God.
Blasphemous would be any attempt, by painting or sculpture, to represent Him.
Egyptian hieroglyphs tried to suggest Him, by putting the figure of an eye upon
a sword, implying that God sees and rules, but how imperfect the suggestion.
When we speak of Hint, it is almost always in language figurative. He is
“Light,” or “Day spring from on high,” or He is a “High Tower,” or the
“Fountain of Living Waters.” After everything that language can do when put to
the utmost strain, and all we can see of God in the natural world and realise
of God in the providential world, we are forced to cry out with Job in my text,
“Lo, these are parts of His ways; but how little a portion is heard of Him? but
the thunder of His power who can understand?” We try to satisfy ourselves with
saying, “It is natural law that controls things, gravitation is at work,
centripetal and centrifugal forces respond to each other.” But what is natural
law? it is only God’s ways of doing things. At every point in the universe it
is God’s direct and continuous power that controls and harmonises and sustains.
What power it must be that keeps the internal fires of our world
imprisoned--only here and there spurting from a Cotopaxi, or a Stromboli, or
from a Vesuvius putting Pompeii and Herculaneum into sepulchre; but for the
most part the internal fires chained in their cages of rock, and century after
century unable to break the chain or burst open the door. What power to keep
the component parts of the air in right proportion, so that all round the world
the nations may breath in health, the frosts and the heats hindered from
working universal demolition. What is that power to us? asks someone. It is
everything to us. With Him on our side, the reconciled God, the sympathetic
God, the omnipotent God, we may defy all human and Satanic antagonisms. We get
some little idea of the Divine power when we see how it buries the proudest
cities and nations. Ancient Memphis it has ground up, until many of its ruins
are no larger than your thumbnail, and you can hardly find a souvenir large
enough to remind you of your visit. The city of Tyre is under the sea which
washes the shore, on which are only a few crumbling pillars left. By such
rehearsal we try to arouse our appreciation of what Omnipotence is, and our
reverence is excited, and our adoration is intensified, but, after all, we find
ourselves at the foot of a mountain we cannot climb, hovering over a depth we
cannot fathom. So all those who have put together systems of theology have
discoursed also about the wisdom of God. Think of a Wisdom which can know the
end from the beginning, that knows the thirtieth century as well as the first
century. We can guess what will happen; but it is only a guess. Think of a Mind
that can hold all of the past and all the present and all the future. We can
contrive and invent on a small scale; but think of a Wisdom that could contrive
a universe! Think of a Wisdom that was able to form, without any suggestion or
any model to work by, the eye, the ear, the hand, the foot, the vocal organs.
What we know is overwhelmed by what we do not know. What the botanist knows
about the flower is not more wonderful than the things he does not know about
the flower. What the geologist knows about the rocks is not more amazing than
the things which he does not know about them. The worlds that have been counted
are only a small regiment of the armies of light, the hosts of heaven, which
have never passed in review before mortal vision. What a God we have! All that
theologians know of God’s wisdom is insignificant compared with the wisdom
beyond human comprehension. The human race never has had, and never will have
enough brain or heart to measure the wisdom of God. “O the depth of the riches
both of the wisdom and knowledge of God! how unsearchable are tits judgments,
and His ways past finding out!” So, also, all systems of theology try to tell
us what is omnipresence, that is God’s capacity to be everywhere at the same
time. So every system of theology has attempted to describe and define the
Divine attribute of love. Easy enough is it to define fatherly love, motherly
love, conjugal love, fraternal love, sisterly love and love of country, but the
love of God defies all vocabulary. I think the love of God was demonstrated in
mightier worlds, before our little world was fitted up for human residence.
Will a man, owning 50,000 acres of land, put all the cultivation on a half
acre? Will God make a million worlds, and put His chief affection on one small
planet? Are the other worlds, and larger worlds, standing vacant, uninhabited,
while this little world is crowded with inhabitants? No, it takes a universe of
worlds to express the love of God! Go ahead, O Church of God! Go ahead, O
world! and tell as well as you can what the love of God is, but know beforehand
that Paul was right when he said, “It passeth knowledge.” Only glimpses of God
have we in this world, but what an hour it will be when we first see Him, and
we will have no more fright than I feel when I now see you. It will not be with
mortal eye that we will behold Him, but with the vision of a cleansed,
forgiven, and perfected spirit. (T. De Witt Talmage.)
Parts of His ways
The man who said that was not left comfortless. Sometimes
in our very desolateness we say things so deep and true as to prove that we are
not desolate at all, if we were only wise enough to seize the comfort of the
very power which sustains us. He who has a great thought has a great treasure.
A noble conception is an incorruptible inheritance. Job’s idea is that we hear
but a whisper. Lo, this is a feeble whispering: the universe is a subdued
voice; even when it thunders it increases the whisper inappreciably as to bulk
and force: all that is now possible to me, Job would say, is but the hearing of
a whisper; but the whisper means that I shall hear more by and by; behind the
whispering there is a great thundering, a thunder of power; I could not bear it
now; the whisper is a Gospel, the whisper is an adaptation to my aural
capacity; it is enough, it is music, it is the tone of love, it is what I need
in my littleness and weariness, in my initial manhood. How many controversies
this would settle if it could only be accepted in its entirety! We know in
part, therefore we prophesy in part; we see only very little portions of
things, therefore we do not pronounce an opinion upon the whole; we hear a
whisper, but it does not follow that we can understand the thunder. There is a
Christian agnosticism. Why are men afraid to be Christian agnostics? Why should
we hesitate to say with patriarchs and apostles, I cannot tell, I do not know;
I am blind, and cannot see in that particular direction; I am waiting? What we
hear now is a whisper, but a whisper that is a promise. We must let many
mysteries alone. No candle can throw a light upon a landscape. We must know
just what we are and where we are, and say we are of yesterday, and know
nothing when we come into the presence of many a solemn mystery. Yet how much
we do know! enough to live upon; enough to go into the world with as fighting
men, that we may dispute with error, and as evangelistic men, that we may
reveal the Gospel. They have taken from us many words which they must bring
back again, when rationalism is restored amongst the stolen vessels of the
Church, agnosticism also will be brought in as one of the golden goblets that
belongs to the treasure of the sanctuary. We, too, are agnostics: we do not
know, we cannot tell; we cannot turn the silence into speech, but we know
enough to enable us to wait. Amid all this difficulty of ignorance we hear a
voice saying, What thou knowest not now, thou shalt know hereafter: I have many
things to say unto you, but ye cannot bear them now: if it were not so, I would
have told you,--as if to say, I know how much to tell, and when to tell it.
Little children, trust your Lord. (Joseph Parker, D. D.)
Limited knowledge of the Creator
The works of God should lead us to God Himself. Our study of the
creature should be to gain a clearer light and knowledge of the Creator. There
are many expressions and impressions of God upon the things which He hath made,
and we never see them as we ought, till in them we see their Maker. A critical
eye looks upon a picture, not so much to see the colours or the paint, as to
discern the skill of the painter or limner; yea, some (as the apostle speaks in
reference to spirituals) have senses so exercised about these artificials that
they will read the artist’s name in the form and exquisiteness of his art. An
Apelles or Michael Angelo needs not to put his name to his work, his work
proclaims his name to those who are judicious beholders of such kind of works.
How much more (as the Psalmist speaks), “that the name of God is near, do His
wondrous works (both of nature and providence) declare” to all discreet
beholders! That which the eye and heart of every godly man is chiefly upon, is
to find out and behold the name, that is, the wisdom, power, and goodness of
God in all His works, both of creation and providence. It were better for us
never to enjoy the creature, than not to enjoy God in it; and it, were better
for us not to see the creature, than not to have a sight of God in it. And yet
when we have seen the most of God which the creature can show us we have reason
to say, how little a portion is seen of Him! And when we have heard the most of
God that can be reported to us from the creation, we have reason to say, as Job
here doth, “How little a portion is heard of Him?” (Joseph Caryl.)
Our ignorance of God
The true knowledge of God is founded in a deep sense of our
ignorance of Him. They know Him best who are most humble that they know Him no
better. In this chapter Job celebrates the power and wisdom of God as manifest
in the works of creation.
I. How little a
portion do we know of His being. That there must be some intelligent,
independent, first cause of all created nature is most certain. This first
Being must subsist necessarily, or by a necessity of nature. But have we any
idea what that means? If He be necessarily existent, He must be eternal. But a
Being subsisting of Himself from all eternity, surpasses the utmost stretch of
our imagination. If God necessarily exist, He must be omnipresent, or present
in all places. But what idea can we form of the Divine immensity?
II. The manner of
God’s existence as much exceeds all our comprehension as the necessary
properties of it. How can we suppose that it should not? If Scripture does not
explain to our understanding the peculiar mode or manner of His existence, or a
distinction of subsistence in the Divine essence, why should the mystery of it
be a stumbling block to our faith, when in the world of nature we are
surrounded with mysteries which we readily believe, though no less
incomprehensible?
III. How little we
know of the Divine perfections. Both His natural and moral perfections leave
our thoughts labouring in the research infinitely behind. What those
perfections are, as subsisting in a limited degree in creatures we know, but
what they are as existing without limits, or to the utmost extent in God, we
know not.
1. When our minds are once satisfied and established in the doctrine
of the Divine perfections, let no difficulties or objections that may arise
from our contemplation of the works of nature, or the ways of providence, be
suffered to weaken our faith therein.
2. When we are speaking of the Divine attributes we commonly say they
are infinite, that is, they have nothing to limit, obstruct, or circumscribe
them, or that they extend to the utmost degree of perfection.
3. The attributes of God are sometimes divided into His communicable
and incommunicable attributes. By the former are meant His moral perfections;
such as His wisdom, holiness, goodness, etc., which in various degrees He
communicates to His creatures. By the latter are understood those attributes
which are appropriate to Deity; such as absolute independence,
self-sufficiency, eternity, immensity, and omnipotence, which are in their own
nature incommunicable to any finite subject.
IV. How little do
we know of the works of God. How few of them fall under our observation! Look
at the minute animal work; at what is revealed by the microscope. Look at the
great world; or at the finished mechanism of our body. How astonishing the
union of two such opposite substances as flesh and spirit.
V. His ways of
providence are as unsearchable as His works of Power. Whilst His thoughts and
views are not as ours, but infinitely more extended, it is no wonder that there
should appear to us inextricable mysteries in the course of His providential
conduct.
VI. How low and
defective is our knowledge of the Word of God. In a revelation that comes from
God, it might reasonably be expected that we should meet with some hidden
truths or sublime doctrines which surpass our understandings.
On the incomprehensibleness of God
Under the dispensation of the new covenant, a clearer knowledge of
the Divine nature and properties was vouchsafed. Yet still the things of heaven
are raised far above the level of mortal faculties. If God under the law made
darkness His pavilion, He dwells under the Gospel in inaccessible light.
I. The
incomprehensibleness of God as it relates to His general nature. Who can
comprehend His distinct personality, combined with His diffused omnipresence?
What clear and distinct notion does man entertain of eternity? Nor can we form
a more accurate notion of unbounded space. God is omnipotent. But God cannot
destroy His own nature. God cannot obliterate space. God cannot act wickedly.
What is this omnipotence which is fettered with so many “canners”? God is a
Spirit. But what does man know of Spirit? God is omniscient. But how can we
reconcile this with the contingent and optional conduct of men as moral and
free agents?
II. To how small an
extent we can comprehend God’s moral attributes. Wisdom, Justice, Holiness,
Mercy. If God be holy, why did He permit the existence of vice? If He be
merciful, wherefore did He permit the existence of suffering? If He be just,
whence the promiscuous distribution of good and evil observable, with little
respect to merit or demerit, in this world? How many such questions might be
asked! Inferences--
1. How exceedingly petulant appear the cavils of infidelity!
2. In those matters of faith wherein we possess no analogy to assist
our power of comprehension, it will be well to rest satisfied with the
authority of Scripture.
3. In our present inability to comprehend the Divine nature, we seem
to possess the valuable earnest of a future state of being. Oh, the exquisite
and endless pleasures which the full comprehension of Divinity will impart to
the unfilmed understanding of man! (Johnson Grant.)
The mystery of Providence
The patriarch, extolling the majesty and might of Jehovah,
adduces various exhibitions of His power in the natural world. The meaning of
Job is, “These manifestations of the Deity, grand and imposing as they are,
present but a very inadequate display of His character and works. They are, as
it were, but a breathing of His power.” It is the feeling of every devout
philosopher engaged in the researches of natural science, “These are parts of
His ways.” When he meets with difficulties, therefore, which baffle his
sagacity, he modestly refers them to his own ignorance, satisfied that there
must be principles or facts, as yet undiscovered, that will explain them. It is
the sciolist who draws sweeping conclusions from scant premises. It will do
much to save science from repeating its mistakes, to keep in mind that in its
profoundest researches into the arcana of nature it sees but “parts of His ways
who made and governs all.” What is here affirmed of creation is no less true of
His providence. Providence comes home to us all. It has to do with everyone’s
affairs at every moment of life. Who does not feel that this whole dispensation
under which we live is a mystery? We come into being heirs of a depraved
nature. The world is a scene replete with temptation, and filled with
suffering. Sin, sorrow, and death range over every part of it. The mystery
which enfolds this whole condition of things deepens when we consider the
character of the Supreme Being. It seems, at first view, to be incompatible
with His moral perfections. We are all pressed with these moral difficulties.
It is a tangled web which we cannot unravel. Sometimes, in meditating on it,
our faith almost gives way. If there be any method of removing or mitigating
these trials, we ought to know it. Take the text as equivalent to the
declaration of the apostle, “We know in part.” To take this world by itself,
dissevered from its relations to the great scheme of providence, and from its
own past and future, is to consign ourselves to atheism and despair. To
contemplate it as a part, and an infinitesimal part of a “stupendous whole,”
will relieve even its darkest features, and assist us in believing that
although “clouds and darkness are round about Him, righteousness and judgment
are the habitation of His throne.” “These are parts of His ways.” There is a prime
truth presented in these last words. We are not to escape from the perplexities
of our position by denying that the Divine government extends to this moral
chaos around us. Whatever is, is by His direction or permission. All these
inequalities of our condition proceed according to a purpose. It is chaos only
to our limited and imperfect vision. It is something to be assured of this. If
these events are but “parts of His ways,” both reason and religion forbid us to
judge of them as though they were the whole of His ways. As parts of God’s
ways, we can so far understand as to perceive that it is what it is because we
are what we are. We may not attempt to penetrate the Divine counsels and
inquire why this order of things was established in preference to any other.
But since it is established, we cannot fail to see that it expresses in a most
emphatic manner God’s hatred of sin. And it is adapted to supply the very
training which we need. We are under the discipline of temptation. (Henry A.
Boardman, D. D.)
The Jubilee of Science in 1881
I endeavour to point out the direct religious bearings of some of
the main discoveries achieved within fifty years. Half a century ago it was
generally held that every living thing, whether animal or plant, from the
lichen on the wall to the cedar of the forest, from the crawling worm to the
king of beasts, and man the crown of all, was called into existence by an
instantaneous fiat, just as we see them now. All Nature was looked upon as a
gigantic stationary stereotype, the handiwork indeed of God, who stood outside
of it, and had done so since creation’s dawn. In presence of that Nature, as
the performance of a Divine artificer, men wondered and worshipped indeed; but
to a large extent their worship was ignorant, and the wonder vacant. Our
admiration lacked intelligence, our awe was a blank dismay. But Darwin and
Wallace arose like prophets in our midst, and at the bidding of their voice
chaos gave place to order, darkness made way for light. People who call
themselves, and think themselves, and are, according to their light, religious,
tell us, forsooth, that this theory of development is not demonstrated, is not
proven, is a mere hypothesis. Of course it is a mere hypothesis. Everything is
a mere hypothesis that attempts to give a philosophical explanation of Nature.
Every effort to piece together, in a consistent whole, the isolated facts of
experience, is a mere hypothesis. But the theory of separate creation is
likewise a mere hypothesis. The question is, which hypothesis is the more
reasonable? To accept this theory of evolution demands an act of faith. Every
intellectual judgment is an act of faith. And just in proportion as it is
earnest and sincere, and bends before the majesty of reason, and is a genuine
endeavour to read a meaning into life and destiny, it is a religious act. There
used to be a time when it was held religious to believe in miracles, in a
stoppage or reversal of the quiet course of Nature. The more prodigies and
marvels, the more inexplicable things a man could accept, or a book recount,
the more religious that man or book was supposed to be. But the more God is
recognised in order, in unbroken sequence and succession, in continuous cause
and effect, in religious reason and persistent purpose, the more will piety
recoil from everything that is miraculous; the more averse will be our reason
and our faith--which is but reason’s confiding or imaginative side--to harbour
the thought of the preternatural, the supernatural, the supernatural. It was
supposed that the human race appeared all of a sudden on the scene some six
thousand years ago, a few centuries more or less after the disappearance of the
extinct mammalia. But modern science carries back the existence of man one
hundred thousand years, and even that is but a portion of the time during which
some high authorities consider we have traces of the race. What are the
religious lessons of this high antiquity of man? Do not Judaism and
Christianity assume quite other proportions in our eyes, in relation to the entire
humanity, than when it was believed that they, together with the light
vouchsafed the patriarchs, constituted a revelation coeval with the lifetime of
mankind? In all these cases, and in many more, it would be easy to show that
the ascertained facts of science are valuable, and fraught with religious and
theological worth; not only because they give the lie direct to many an ancient
preconception, and many a narrowing prejudice, but because they open a wide and
legitimate door to authorised flights of imagination and reasonable faith. The
Bible will not lose its charm, nor its lessons their sanctity, because better
understood, and more justly valued, than of old. (E. M. Geldart, M. A.)
The thunder of His power.
A discourse upon the power of God
The text is a lofty declaration of the Divine power, with a
particular note of attention--“Lo!” Doctrine. Infinite and incomprehensible
power pertains to the nature of God, and is expressed in part in His works.
Though there be a mighty expression of Divine power in His works, yet an
incomprehensible power pertains to His nature. His power glitters in all His
works, as well as His wisdom.
I. The nature of
this power.
1. Power sometimes signifies authority. But power taken for strength,
and power taken for authority, are distinct things. The power of God here is to
be understood of His strength to act.
2. Power is divided ordinarily into absolute and ordinate. Absolute
is that power whereby God is able to do that which He will not do, but is
possible to be done. Ordinate is that power whereby God doth that which He hath
decreed to do. These are not distinct powers, but one and the same power.
3. The power of God is that ability and strength whereby He can bring
to pass whatever He please, whatever His infinite wisdom can direct, and
whatever the infinite purity of His will can resolve. Power, in the primary
notion of it, doth not signify an act, but an ability to bring a thing into
act.
4. This power is of a distinct conception from the wisdom and will of
God. They are not really distinct, but according to our conceptions. We cannot
discourse of Divine things, without absolutely some proportion of them with
human, ascribing unto God the perfections, sifted from the imperfections, of
our nature. In us there are three orders--of understanding, will, power; and
accordingly three acts--counsel, resolution, execution; which, though they are
distinct in us, are not distinct in God.
5. As power is essentially in God, so it is not distinct from His
essence. Omnipotence is nothing but the Divine essence efficacious ad extra.
It is His essence as operative.
6. The power of God gives activity to all the other perfections of
His nature; and is of a larger extent and efficacy, in regard of its objects,
than some perfections of His nature.
7. This power is infinite. A finite power is a limited power, and a
limited power cannot effect everything that is possible. The objects of Divine
power are innumerable--not essentially infinite. God can do infinitely more
than He hath done, or will do.
8. The impossibility of God’s doing some things is no infringing of
His almightiness, but rather a strengthening of it. Some things are impossible
in their own nature. Such as imply a contradiction. Some things are impossible
to the nature and being of God. Some are impossible to the glorious perfections
of God. He cannot do anything unworthy of Himself.
II. Reasons to
prove that God must needs be powerful.
1. The power that is in creatures demonstrates a greater and an
inconceivable power in God. Nothing in the world is without a power of activity
according to its nature. All the power which is distinct in the creatures must
be united in God.
2. If there were not an incomprehensible power in God, He would not
be perfect.
3. The simplicity of God manifests it.
4. The miracles that have been in the world evidence the power of
God.
III. How His power
appears--in creation, in government, in redemption.
1. In creation.
2. In government. God decreed from eternity the particular ends of
creatures, and their operations respecting those ends. As there was need of His
power to execute His decree of creation, there is also need of His power to
execute His decree about the manner of government. All government is an act of
the understanding, will, and power. This power is evident in natural
government, which consists in the preservation of all things, propagation of
them by corruptions and generations, and in a cooperation with them in their
motives to attain their ends. In moral government, which is of the hearts and
actions of men. And in gracious government, as respecting the Church.
3. In redemption. This is the most admirable work that ever God
brought forth in the world. This will appear--
IV. Uses.
1. Of information and instruction. If incomprehensible and infinite
power belongs to the nature of God, then Jesus Christ hath a Divine nature,
because the acts of power proper to God are ascribed to Him. Hence may also be
inferred the deity of the Holy Ghost. Works of omnipotency are ascribed to the
Spirit of God.
2. The power of God is contemned and abused. Contemned in every sin;
in distrust of God; in too great fear of man; and by trusting in ourselves.
Abused when we make use of it to justify contradictions; by presuming on it,
without using the means He hath appointed. This doctrine is full of comfort,
and it teacheth us the fear of God. (S. Charnock.)
The power of God
I. The nature of
God’s power. Power sometimes signifies authority; here it signifies strength.
1. The power of God is that ability or strength whereby He can bring
to pass whatsoever He pleaseth, whatsoever His infinite wisdom can direct, and
the unspotted purity of His will resolve.
2. The power of God gives activity to all the other perfections of
His nature. As holiness is the beauty, so power is the life of His attributes
in their exercise.
3. This power is originally and essentially in His nature. The power
of God is not derived from anything without Him.
4. Hence it follows that the power of God is infinite. Nothing can be
too difficult for the Divine power to effect.
II. Wherein the
power of God is manifested.
1. In creation.
2. In the government of the world.
In effecting His purpose by small means. In the work of our
redemption. Note the Person redeeming; the progress of His life; His
resurrection. Note the publication of it. The power of God was manifested in
the instruments; and in the success of their ministry. Conclude--
1. Here is comfort in all afflictions. Our evils can never be so
great to distress us as His power is to deliver.
2. This doctrine teaches us the fear of God. “Who would not fear
Thee?” (Skeletons of Sermons.)
──《The Biblical Illustrator》