| Back to Home Page | Back to Book Index
|
Ezra Chapter
Eight
Ezra 8
Chapter Contents
The companions of Ezra. (1-20) Ezra implores God's
blessing. (21-23) Treasures committed to the priests. (24-30) Ezra arrives at
Jerusalem. (31-36)
Commentary on Ezra 8:1-20
(Read Ezra 8:1-20)
Ezra assembles the outcasts of Israel, and the dispersed
of Judah. God raised up the spirits of a small remnant to accompany him. What a
pity that good men should omit a good work, for want of being spoken to!
Commentary on Ezra 8:21-23
(Read Ezra 8:21-23)
Ezra procured Levites to go with him; but what will that
avail, unless he have God with him? Those who seek God, are safe under the
shadow of his wings, even in their greatest dangers; but those who forsake him,
are always exposed. When entering upon any new state of life, our care should
be, to bring none of the guilt of the sins of our former condition into it.
When we are in any peril, let us be at peace with God, and then nothing can do
us any real hurt. All our concerns about ourselves, our families, and our
estates, it is our wisdom and duty, by prayer to commit to God, and to leave
the care of them with him. And, on some occasions, we should decline advantages
which are within our reach, lest we should cause others to stumble, and so our
God be dishonoured. Let us ask wisdom of God, that we may know how to use or to
refuse lawful things. We shall be no losers by venturing, suffering, or giving
up for the Lord's sake. Their prayers were answered, and the event declared it.
Never have any that sought God in earnest, found that they sought him in vain.
In times of difficulty and danger, to set a season apart for secret or for
social prayer, is the best method for relief we can take.
Commentary on Ezra 8:24-30
(Read Ezra 8:24-30)
Do we expect that God should, by his providence, keep
that which belongs to us, let us, by his grace, keep that which belongs to him.
Let God's honour and interest be our care; and then we may expect that our
lives and comforts will be his.
Commentary on Ezra 8:31-36
(Read Ezra 8:31-36)
Enemies laid wait for the Jews, but God protected them.
Even the common perils of journeys, call us to go out with prayer, and to
return with praise and thanksgiving. But what shall we render when the Lord has
led us safely through the pilgrimage of life, through the gloomy vale of death,
out of the reach of all our enemies, into everlasting happiness! Among their
sacrifices they had a sin-offering. The atonement sweetens and secures every
mercy to us, which will not be truly comfortable, unless sin be taken away, and
our peace made with God. Then had the church rest. The expressions here used,
direct us to the deliverance of sinners from spiritual bondage, and their
pilgrimage to the heavenly Jerusalem, under the care and protection of their
God and Saviour.
── Matthew Henry《Concise Commentary on Ezra》
Ezra 8
Verse 3
[3] Of
the sons of Shechaniah, of the sons of Pharosh; Zechariah: and with him were
reckoned by genealogy of the males an hundred and fifty.
Males —
Though the males only be expressed yet doubtless they carried the women along
with them, as they did the little ones.
Verse 13
[13] And of the last sons of Adonikam, whose names are these, Eliphelet, Jeiel,
and Shemaiah, and with them threescore males.
Whose names are, … — It
seems the rest came before; so that now all the sons of that family returned.
Verse 15
[15] And
I gathered them together to the river that runneth to Ahava; and there abode we
in tents three days: and I viewed the people, and the priests, and found there
none of the sons of Levi.
Of Levi —
None who were simple Levites, and not the priests. And therefore the Levites
mentioned, chap. 7:7, by anticipation were not yet come to him.
Verse 18
[18] And
by the good hand of our God upon us they brought us a man of understanding, of
the sons of Mahli, the son of Levi, the son of Israel; and Sherebiah, with his
sons and his brethren, eighteen;
By the good hand — If
where ministers have been wanting, the vacancies are well supplied, let us
ascribe it to the good hand of God, qualifying them for the service, inclining
them to it, and opening a door for them.
Verse 21
[21] Then I proclaimed a fast there, at the river of Ahava, that we might
afflict ourselves before our God, to seek of him a right way for us, and for
our little ones, and for all our substance.
A fast —
For public mercies. Publick prayers must be made, that all who are to share in
the comfort, may share in the requests for it.
Afflict ourselves —
For our sins; and so be qualified for the pardon of them. When we are entering
on any new condition of life, our care should be to bring into it none of the
guilt of the sins of our former condition. When we are in any imminent danger,
let us make our peace with God, and then nothing can hurt us.
Right way — A
safe and prosperous journey; such a way and course as might be best for us.
Verse 23
[23] So
we fasted and besought our God for this: and he was intreated of us.
Intreated — He
gave us an assurance of his gracious answer to our request.
Verse 35
[35] Also
the children of those that had been carried away, which were come out of the
captivity, offered burnt offerings unto the God of Israel, twelve bullocks for
all Israel, ninety and six rams, seventy and seven lambs, twelve he goats for a
sin offering: all this was a burnt offering unto the LORD.
Sin offering —
For it is the atonement that secures every mercy to us, which will not be truly
comfortable, unless iniquity be taken away, and our peace made with God. They
offer twelve bullocks, twelve he-goats, and ninety six rams, (eight times
twelve) signifying the union of the two kingdoms. They did not any longer go
two tribes one way, and ten tribes another; but all the twelve met by their
representatives at the same altar.
── John Wesley《Explanatory Notes on Ezra》
08 Chapter 8
Verses 1-20
And I gathered them together to the river that runneth to Ahava.
The assembly at Ahava
I. The long
journey commenced.
II. An important
inspection made. This halt illustrates--
1. The need of seasons of rest.
2. The use of seasons of rest.
III. A grave
deficiency discovered. Ministers of religion are sometimes slow in making
personal sacrifices and rendering personal assistance even in a good
enterprise.
IV. The supply of
the deficienct sought. He sought them--
1. By means of influential men.
2. By sending them to the right place.
3. By sending them to the right man.
4. By sending them with precise instructions.
V. The supply of
the deficiency obtained.
1. The supply was sufficient.
2. The supply was various.
3. The supply was remarkable for the presence of at least one man of
distinguished ability.
4. The supply was obtained by the blessing of God. (William Jones.)
A man of understanding, of
the sons of Mahli.
Men of understanding
I. Are the gifts
of God.
1. They derive their abilities from Him.
2. They rightly develop their abilities by His blessing.
3. They attain their moral excellences by His blessing.
II. Are of great
worth amongst men.
1. Understanding is essential to the beneficent employment of other
gifts and powers.
2. The employment of understanding itself confers great benefits upon
society.
Conclusion:
It behoves us--
1. To praise God for men of understanding.
2. To prize such men.
3. To endeavour to become men of understanding. (William Jones.)
Verse 21
Then I proclaimed a fast there.
Prayer and fasting
(preached on the occasion of a public fast):--
I. That the best
means to procure success upon our counsels and endeavours is to seek God for
his blessing.
1. This results from the first principles on which all religion is
built.
2. In giving His assistance God does not always act in so palpable a
manner as that whereby we see second causes producing their effects. But that
it is the most rational and most religious way to begin at Heaven in all His
consultations and designs will appear by reflecting--
II. That solemn
fasting is a proper method to be used in such addresses to God. We have but two
ways to express our thoughts and the inclinations of our minds, either by words
or by such actions as naturally flow from them, and both of these are equally
proper and therefore such as become our devotions. For God is the author of
decency and order, and His service is then most decent and orderly when it is
unaffected and agreeable to nature; and therefore such gestures or actions are
proper in His worship which do naturally flow from or by custom are used to
accompany such a disposition of mind as we ought to be in when we make our
approaches to Him. Thus kneeling becomes us at our prayers, because it is the
usual posture of supplicants; singing of hymns is decent in thanksgiving,
because songs and music are fit attendants on praise and joy; and fasting is
extremely proper for a solemn humiliation before God, for the begging pardon of
our sins, and assistance in our difficulties, because it is a natural
expression of sorrow, and is productive of humble thoughts in ourselves and
devout ones towards God. And therefore we find that it has been the practice
not only of the Churches of God, but even of the heathens themselves, to use
solemn fasts upon extraordinary applications to Heaven, so that fasting is a
part of worship prescribed by nature and by common sense of men. Public fasting
should be attended with public demonstrations of seriousness, such as gravity
in our discourse and behaviour, a ceasing from the business of our particular
callings, abstaining from ornaments, recreations, and places of civil
concourse, and spending the day in the public devotions of the Church and in
the retirements of our closets. For though It private Christian may fast (as he
may pray) without any of this pomp, and discharge the duty in his own breast,
yet to make it public there is no other way but an outward solemnity; and a
community cannot hold a fast but by such an appearance. In this the minds of
men are more apt to be grave and serious when there is no appearance of jollity
to divert them, they are drawn off from thoughts of worldly business and fixed
on pious meditations, when they see their neighbours thronging to the temple,
when there is no commerce in the shops nor hurry in the streets. Such a face of
things shows that men are about the more serious business of another world. (William
Hayley, D. D.)
Verse 22
For I was ashamed to require of the king a band of soldiers.
Ezra’s confidence in God
I. Confidence in
God avowed.
1. In His providence.
2. In His providence as efficiently promoting the interests of His
people.
3. In His providence as opposed to those who forsake Him.
II. Confidence in
God tested.
1. By their need of guidance.
2. By their need of protection.
III. Confidence in
god maintained.
1. In not seeking guidance and defence from the king.
2. In seeking guidance and defence from God.
IV. Confidence in
god vindicated.
1. In their inward assurance.
2. In the outward result. (William Jones.)
Ezra and his times
I. Ezra’s language
was in striking contrast with the general state of opinion around him. He knew
he was right, and could afford to be singular. At particular crises of public
opinion it devolves upon some men to go into the land of the enemy, that they
may bring truth out of captivity. Such men have no ultimate fear for truth; they
know its vitality. Such men never change sides. The world wonders at their
eccentricity, and recommends them to beg or borrow a band of soldiers and
horsemen to assist them in their progress; but they are ashamed to think of
such a thing. If they could make truth successful to-morrow they must do it
with truth’s weapons and her weapons only; but they cannot advance the
liberation of truth by any unworthy means, or by any unnatural alliance.
II. Ezra’s
situation afforded him an opportunity for asserting this great principle under
very trying circumstances. Christ’s whole life illustrates Ezra’s principle of
confidence in God under circumstances of great temptation. (W. G. Barrett.)
Ezra an example in business
I. His
humiliation.
II. His faith.
III. His prayer.
IV. His holy
jealousy.
V. His success. (R.
Cecil.)
Heroic faith
Our text gives us a glimpse of high-toned faith, and a
noble strain of feeling. Ezra knew that he had but to ask and have an escort
from the king that would ensure their safety till they saw Jerusalem. It took
some strength of principle to abstain from asking what it would have been so
natural to ask, so easy to get, so comfortable to have. The symbolic phrase
“the hand of our God,” as expressive of the Divine protection, occurs with remarkable
frequency in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, and though not peculiar to them,
is yet strikingly characteristic of them. It has a certain beauty and force of
its own. The hand is, of course, the seat of active power. It is on or over a
man like some great shield held aloft above him, below which there is safe
hiding. So that great hand bends itself over us, and we are secure beneath its
hollow. As a child sometimes carries a tender-winged butterfly in the globe of
its two hands, that the bloom on its wings may not be ruffled by its
fluttering, so He carries our feeble, enamoured souls enclosed in the covert of
His almighty hand. As a father may lay his own large muscular hand on his
child’s tiny fingers to help him, or as “Elisha put his hands on the king’s
hands,” that the contact might strengthen him to shoot the arrow of the Lord’s
deliverance, so the hand of our God is upon us to impart power as well as
protection; and “our bow abides in strength” when “the arms of our hands are
made strong by the hands of the mighty God of Jacob.” That was Ezra’s faith,
and that should be ours. Note Ezra’s sensitive shrinking from anything like
inconsistency between his creed and his practice, and we may well learn this
lesson--to be true to our professed principles; to beware of making our
religion a matter of words; to live, when the time for putting them into
practice comes, by the maxims which we have been forward to proclaim when there
was no risk of applying them; and to try sometimes to look at our lives with the
eyes of people who do not share our faith, that we may bring our actions up to
the mark of what they expect of us. Especially in regard to this matter of
trust in an unseen hand, and reliance on visible helps, we all need to be very rigid
in our self-inspection. Faith in the good hand of God upon us for good should
often lead to the abandonment, and always to the subordination, of material
aids. Each man must settle for himself when abandonment or subordination is his
duty. We ought to work into our lives the principle that the absolute surrender
and forsaking of external helps and goods is sometimes essential to the
preservation and due expression of reliance on God. What shall we say of people
who profess that God is their portion and are as eager in the scramble for
money as anybody? What kind of commentary? Will sharp-sighted, sharp-tongued
observers have a right to make on us, whose creed is so unlike theirs, while
our lives are identical? Do you believe that “the hand of our God is upon all
them for good that seek Him”? Then do you not think that racing after the
prizes of this world, with flushed cheek and labouring breath, or longing, with
a gnawing hunger of heart, for any earthly good, or lamenting over the removal
of creaturely defences and joys, as if heaven were empty because some one’s
place here is, or as if God were dead because dear ones die, may well be a
shame to us, and a taunt on the lips of our enemies? Note further that his
faith not only
impels him to the renunciation of the Babylonian guard, but to earnest
supplication for the defence in which he is so confident. So for us the
condition and preparation on and by which we are sheltered by that great hand
is the faith that asks and the asking of faith. We make God responsible for our
safety when we abandon other defence and commit ourselves to Him. He will
accept the trust and set His guards about us. So our story ends with the
triumphant vindication of this Quixotic faith: “The hand of our God was upon us, and He
delivered us from the hand of the enemy, and of such as lay in wait by the way;
and we came to Jerusalem.” The ventures of faith are ever rewarded. When we
come to tell the completed story of our lives, we shall have to record the
fulfilment of all God’s promises, and the accomplishment of all our prayers
that were built on these. (A. Maclaren, D. D.)
Fear of inconsistency
I. Ezra’s
conviction.
1. He was convinced that there were some men who sought God, and
others who forsook Him. There were some who sought--
But there were others who cared for none of these things. So it is
still. There are some who read the Bible and listen to the gospel with an
earnest desire to know God, and who feel that to have God for their friend is
to have the business of life accomplished; while there are others who turn a
deaf ear to the invitations of Divine love, and who never seriously ask
regarding the requirements of the law of God. The conviction of Ezra is that of
every thoughtful good man. There is also the further conviction that this is
the grand distinction. He who thinks of one neighbour being a seeker of God,
and another a forsaker of God, looks at a distinction of the soul, and one
which will prove lasting and important as the soul itself.
2. Ezra was convinced that God’s hand for good was on the one class, and that His
power and wrath were against the other.
Sloth and intemperance and profligacy lead to ruin, while
diligence and sobriety lead to respectability and competence.
3. Ezra was convinced that he and his companions were among those who
sought God, and on whom God’s hand was for good. He calls Jehovah “our Lord.”
His language was intended to convey that they were in a state of favour with
God, and that they knew this. From this we learn that a man may assure himself
of God’s friendship.
II. Ezra’s
declaration of his conviction. This declaration was probably made when he
requested authority to make his proposed journey to Jerusalem, At such a time
he would feel under peculiar obligation to declare his belief in God, and his
hope that Jehovah was his own Father, Protector, and Guide. This obligation
every good man ought to feel. Christ requires us to confess Him. Such a
profession is made by the observance of outward and positive institutions. When
a man calls his family around him, sings a song of praise, and reads a portion
of Scripture, and presents an offering of supplication and thanksgiving, he is
telling his children and neighbours that he is a disciple of Jesus Christ. When
he engages in the exercises of public worship, and especially when he takes his
place at the communion-table, he is making an open and decided declaration that
he is a disciple of Jesus.
III. Ezra’s anxiety
lest he should do anything inconsistent with this declaration. Two instructive
points require to be looked at.
1. There was real and great danger.
2. The inconsistency from which he shrank was more apparent than
real. A good man believes that God renews the face of the earth, and covers the
valleys with corn, but he does not neglect to plough and sow; he believes that
God is a refuge and a strength, a sun and a shield, yet he takes food when he
is hungry and medicine when he is sick; he does not expect that God is to
protect and bless him apart from such means as prudence and experience may
dictate. If Ezra had asked for a guard of soldiers, the request would not have
been inconsistent with confidence in the power and faithfulness of God, but it
would probably have appeared so to the king and his nobles, and he feared lest
in this way the character of God should suffer. Things which are in themselves
lawful are at times inexpedient, and a Christian man by doing such things may
greatly injure both his comfort and usefulness. A. sacrifice of principle and a
wise consideration of times and circumstances are very different things, and to
confound them shows only ignorance and folly. (J. B. Johnston, D. D.)
The good hand of God
It is a glimpse into a spiritual history which our text here
presents to us. Of Ezra himself we have but a vague and shadowy idea; he has
long since passed to the realm where storms and struggles are ended, and the
mystery of life gives place to the clear sunlight of God’s love. But within
that strong, devout soul a great struggle was once fought out. The anxious
questioning of his troubled and perplexed spirit was real enough then. And
while it is possible to miss the true lesson and to push the teaching to a
dangerous extreme, it will, if we penetrate to the spirit of the story, supply
an answer to a modern problem and a truth fruitful for our modern lives. Ezra
sought to satisfy the old equation between the Divine power and the human
agency. He put to himself the familiar question--Is the use of means any the
less a trusting in God? may not the means fall within the compass of God’s plan
of deliverance? And the issue of the struggle was this: at every hazard he must stand right with
God and with his own heart, and therefore he refused to resort to an arm of
flesh at all. We appear to have here a plain and blank refusal to use means.
Some would have said--“Surely we may trust in the good hand of God, and the
soldiers of the king.” But to Ezra’s scrupulous faith it presented an
alternative. One or the other but not both. One or the other he must elect to
have. He refused, not only because of the nature of the instrument, but also
because it was an instrument. He said in effect, “Both we and our enemies are
in the hands of God; it is His work, therefore, and not ours, to secure our
safety and our welfare.” Let us not suppose that we have here a unique instance
of complete trust in God. It was when Jacob saw no human way of escape, and God
had showed him his utter helplessness, that he went forth with a calm face and
a brave heart to meet his brother Esau. It was when the horsemen were hard upon
the children of Israel that the Lord began to trouble the Egyptians. There is
nothing grander in this Book than the calm tramp of Moses on through the
wilderness, with no attempt at self-defence, only the simple assurance, “The
Lord shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace.” Let me remind you of
the boy who went to meet the mightiest of living warriors with a sling and a
stone. Perhaps there were some who said, “Surely you can trust in God and put
on the armour of Saul as well.” But David felt that the armour was unnecessary
if he had the shield of God’s power. In all these examples we find a faith which rested in God
and not in means of deliverance. We may find it hard to understand Ezra,
because our Christian character is often composed of one part of faith and
ninety-nine parts of common sense, while his contained ninety-nine parts of faith and one
part common sense. We trust in God, but feel safer if the mail-clad warriors
are at our side; we know the twelve legions of angels are around us, but we are
glad to feel the two swords concealed beneath our cloaks; we believe that the
manna will fall day by day, yet we like to take bread with us lest it should
fail to come. At the same time it is important to observe that it is the spirit
of this incident we are to copy and not the form. As an instance of the
rejection of means it is not an instance for all times and for all circumstances. Our
Lord Himself taught us not to trust in God to do that which we may do for
ourselves. The jars of water at Cane, the net cast into the sea, and the stone
rolled away from the sepulchre, teach us that God will work through earthly
instruments. But we maintain that failure oftener results from trusting in the
means more than in God than from trusting in God and not in means. It i| the
deepest truth for the Christian worker that our churches, our ministrations,
our methods, are but channels for the grace of God. We want not so much the
eloquent tongue as the bended knee; not so much the crowded church as the crowded prayer
meeting; not so much the beautiful temple as the glory of the Lord within. The
great need now is not for better and more perfect machinery, but for a more
consecrated spiritual life, and for a profounder trust in God, who can work
with or without our machinery. It is, moreover, the secret of peace for the
Christian life. But further, not only had Ezra the earnest longing to be right
with God, but also to seem right. He was unwilling to put any stumbling-block
in the way of the king. Though Artaxerxes might grant the request, might it not
lessen his conception of the goodness and power of God? This age, which more
than any other demands reality in its religion, demands the most careful
seeming also. Tell men that we are pilgrims, and then let them see us making our
habitations here; tell them that we are laying up the incorruptible riches, and
then let them see us intent on the corruptible gain; tell them our confidence
is in God, and
then let them see us as hard in sorrow, as cynical in disappointment, as
unbelieving in distress as themselves; tell them that we live for the unseen
and the eternal, and then let them mark us caring for nothing we cannot see and
clutch with our fingers; tell them that we confess a higher allegiance, and bow
before a higher will, and then let them see us conforming our lives to their
cold, worldly maxims, and we may say what we will, but they will treasure up
our words as among the hollow falsities of a false creed. Let us be on our
guard not to offend a watching world by the broad gulf between the spoken word
and the visible life. (J. H. Shakespeare, M. A.)
Faith and prudence
Ezra felt what Christian people still often feel, the conflict
between prudence and faith. We observe--
I. That as a grand
rule in the Christian life faith and prudence must go together. The Scriptures
give no countenance to presumptuous reliance on supernatural intervention. As a
rule of life they bind us to take all human precautions against the various
forms of mischief we have reason to apprehend. In this unbelieving generation
there is not much reason to speak against excessive faith, but there is some
reason. The workman gave as his reason for not going to church, “That religious
people were hypocrites because they called the temple God’s house, and yet put upon
it a lightning rod.” This worldly workman could not see that God’s Church ought
to recognise God’s law, and act agreeably thereto; but he thought that he saw a
glaring contradiction in this union of prudence and piety. And some noble men
in the Church sympathise with this workman, and reject the securities which
prudence would counsel. They have no faith in the band of soldiers. They leave
their property uninsured; in times of disturbance they will not claim the
protection of the magistrate; and in times of sickness they will not call the
physician. That is, to a large extent, a serious mistake. As a rule we are to
accept the band of soldiers which Ezra, in peculiar circumstances, rejected. We
must not rashly cast ourselves into peril on the idea that angels have charge
concerning us. We must not tempt the Lord our God. If devout men do not attend
to the dictates of prudence they must suffer for it; and not only so, but they
injure Christianity likewise. The truth of religion is based on false issues,
and thus brought into suspicion or contempt. As the rule of life we must march
through the desert with the hand of soldiers. Our religion is not fatalism.
“The good man guideth his affairs with discretion.” Yet there are times--
II. When faith in
God must supersede the provisions of ordinary prudence. When faith and prudence
gave different counsel, Ezra chose to walk by faith, and we must all feel that
he did right. The question is: When are we to go beyond merely prudential
considerations and venture all on the unseen power of God? When are we
justified in neglecting policy and appealing to the higher law? We are “shut
up” to “faith” when--
1. Prudential action would most probably be construed as a denial of
the Divine government. Ezra had told the king that “the hand of God was upon
all them for good who feared Him,” And now he considered that to reveal any
anxiety for a guard of soldiers would appear to the heathen king like a
practical denial of the overshadowing providence of Jehovah. On this ground he
elected to brave the perils of the wilderness without the military escort. A
band of soldiers would have hidden the Shepherd of Israel, Artaxerxes alone
would have been seen; and so Ezra, with a fine spiritual instinct, saw the hour
for simple trust had come, and by declining the soldiers left open the full
view of God and His gracious and glorious government. A line of action is
marked here for ourselves. To remove the scruples of the few we are not to take
the lightning conductors from our temples and essay similar reformations; but
we must seek so to act that we satisfy the world generally that we do believe
in the Divine
superintendence and care. A worldly man believes only in the band of soldiers;
and to let him know that we believe in something beyond we must sometimes be
Willing to act without the soldiers altogether. Are we not too anxious about
material helps end visible securities? Has not the Church, by clinging so
feverishly to visible resources and helps and defenders, given some sanction to
the world’s unbelief? Ezra blushed to ask Artaxerxes for help that might seem a
denial of the power and presence of God. Are we sufficiently sensitive on this
matter? Trapp says, “It is the ingenuity of saints to study God’s ends more
than their own.” And if we are very jealous for the honour of God, and seek to
uphold His government in the eyes of the world, we shall sometimes be ready to
imperil our personal interest and safety for His sake; and let us be assured
that when we act in this lofty spirit of faith and self-forgetfulness, we shall
not be confounded. When--
2. Prudential action would cause us to lean on worldly associations
and resources. Artaxerxes was an idolater, and Ezra was anxious not to ask too
much at his
hands. It seemed inconsistent to Ezra that he should be soliciting a band of
pagan soldiers to protect God’s people and the treasures of God’s temple.
Policy drove him to find assistance in a suspicious quarter, and so he retired
to the higher ground of simple trust in God. Here again we have a line of
action marked out for us. We are the confessed servants of the Holy One of
Israel, and prudence must not lead us to worldly alliances and dependence upon
sinful circles. In our personal life we must observe this. We must beware of
compromises with the world for the sake of our personal safety and
aggrandisement. And in regard to God’s Church we must observe this. Policy
would often direct us to expect great things from the greatness, wealth, or
wisdom of unregenerate men for the Church’s sake. So far from seeking their
assistance, we ought to be shy of their gold and their patronage. Thus did
Ezra. And thus acted Paul and Silas (Acts 16:16-19). When prudence would lead
us to seek for much, either for ourselves or for the Church, at the hands of
unbelieving men, we must pause and follow the path faith indicates. Let us dare
anything, suffer anything, rather than compromise our own character and the
character of God in the eyes of the world by linking our fortunes and the
fortunes of the Church with those who are joined to idols. When--
3. Prudential action might embarrass the progress of God’s kingdom.
If Artaxerxes had detected any inconsistency in Ezra he might have ceased to be
favourable to his cause and have prevented or delayed the return to Jerusalem.
Rather than endanger the popularity and progress of the cause of God, Ezra was
prepared to run great risks. Here another line of action is marked out for us.
If prudence would circumscribe, fetter, or destroy the work of God, the time
has come to appeal to loftier considerations. Calculating, cautious piety would
condemn the act of Ezra as imprudent; but many imprudent things have been done
or there would not have been so much Christianity in the world as there is; and
many more imprudent things will have to be done before Christianity fills the
world. Let us remember that God’s kingdom is a supernatural one, and in its
promotion we must often act with a boldness which could not be justified in the
court of prudence. There is a holy venturesomeness in evangelisation which
carries with it a far higher guarantee of success than do the pondered schemes
of a rationalising statesmanship. Thus, then, there are times when we must
renounce the counsellings of worldly wisdom and, stepping boldly into the
darkness, cry with Ezra, “Help us, O Lord our God, for we rest on Thee.”
III. The separation
of faith from prudence must be effected only in the spirit of sincere and
earnest dependence upon heaven (verse 23). No precipitancy, no levity, no
presumption. By fasting and prayer they obtained the assurance that God would
honour their faith and preserve them. Not lightly must we discard ordinary
defences and helps. When we can do no other we must humbly, solemnly rest
ourselves in the hands of God. The times come to us all when faith and policy
give contradictory counsel. When such times come let us not be found wanting to
our profession and our God. In many circumstances simple trust in God will prove
to be the truest policy. In Hebrews 11:7 Noah’s conduct in preparing
the ark is spoken of as “prudence.” “By his believing obedience he came to be
at last the one who was truly prudent. A truth of great practical importance.
He who like a child blindly follows the will of God, regardless of all
consequences, is the one who is truly prudent, for he builds on the Eternal,
and He will never allow His own to come to shame.”--Ebrard. And on the
contrary, policy leading God’s people to rest on worldly men and means and measures,
finally demoralises and betrays them (Isaiah 31:3). (W. L. Watkinson.)
Alliance with God
We are like William of Orange, with a few followers and an empty
purse, making war against the master of half the world, with the mines of Peru
for a treasury. But like William, too, when questioned concerning our
resources, we can reply, “Before we took up this cause we entered into a close
alliance with the King of Kings.” Those on the Lord’s side are on the winning
side. He never has, and never will, lose a battle. (David Gracey.)
God’s protection
Pastor Oncken was forbidden by the burgomaster of Hamburg from
holding religious meetings. “Do you see that little finger?” said the
burgomaster; “as long as I can move that finger, so long will I put down the
Baptists.” “Yes,” said Oncken, “I see your little finger, and I see also the
great arm of God; and whilst that arm is lifted on our behalf, your little
finger will have little terror for us.
Want of faith in God manifested
Mr. G. J. Holyoake, in his “Sixty Years of an Agitator’s Life,”
gives an interesting account of the Zulus who converted Bishop Colenso. Robert
Ryder, a secular carpenter, was employed by the bishop to build his church and
school-house in Natal. Ryder sent Mr. Holyoake several photographs of the
actual Zulus who accomplished the conversion, long before the change was heard
of in England. The Zulu workers under Ryder were conversed with by the bishop
daily. They were remarkably shrewd in argument. They remarked upon the fact
that the bishop had a room built in the rear of his church, in which he stored
an eighteen-pounder. They knew what that cannon was for, and they thought that
the bishop, fair-spoken as he was, did not place his ultimate reliance on the
“Good Father,” in whom he told them to trust.
Faith in God
A century ago William Carey entered Nottingham with the
thought in his heart, from which he preached the following day in a sermon
which really originated the Baptist Missionary Society: “Expect great things from God. Attempt
great things for God.” It was a very simple thing. It was very memorable. It
was one of those inspirations that illumine as by a single flash the whole
realm of thought. “Expect great things from God.” Looking back over a hundred
years, it was interesting to note upon what Carey based his expectations. Not
on human resources, not on wealth, not on eloquence. Those few men who gathered
together at Kettering had no worldly backing. They were obscure men in the
extreme. With scarcely an exception they were quite unknown outside their own
immediate neighbourhood. The wise and prudent in the Christian world doomed the
enterprise to ignominious failure. With one exception, there was not a man of
any mark in London who would have anything to do with it, and when a meeting
was held to consider the advisability of forming an auxiliary, the idea was
negatived by an overwhelming majority. But Carey believed in God. Doubts,
unlikelihoods, impossibilities, vanished from his mind. And what has been the
result of this faith? During the last hundred years, wherever the missionary
had gone God had given testimony to the word of His grace by signs and wonders
as marvellous as miracle. As in no former age the world lay open, aye, and
opened-minded to the Gospel. (J. Culross.)
Fearlessness of the godly
“I go up alone,” General Gordon wrote, as he started from
Cairo to Khartoum, “with an Infinite Almighty God to direct and guide me; and I
am so called to trust in Him as to fear nothing, and, indeed, to feel sure of
success.”
A lesson of faith
I was passing one of the busiest spots in the City of
London, opposite the Royal Exchange. Here numerous turnings meet, and pour
their mighty burden of vehicular traffic in bewildering streams. As the cabs,
carriages, carts and waggons hastened along I could not help thinking what need
there was for care in crossing, and how dangerous at that busy hour a false
step would be. With such thoughts, nay attention was attracted by something
that seemed entirely out of harmony with the whole surroundings. Right in the midst of the
danger, at a time when the traffic was most bewildering, I saw a woman crossing
the street. She was pushing a perambulator, not eagerly or excitedly trying to
reach the other side, but with perfect calmness, and apparently without fear.
What was the explanation? A City policeman held her arm, and she relied upon
him. And shall we not place the same confidence in our Guide, and though
dangers and difficulties, and trials and temptations surround us, shall we not
trust Him perfectly who is able to keep us from falling, and to present us,
faultless before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy? Shall we not
disdain to fear, knowing that we are protected and sustained by the everlasting
arm? (Signal.)
Luther’s courage
Luther’s words in the first struggles of his public ministry have
the sacred anxiety, the solemn confidence, and almost the language, of the
apostle: “I am
compassed with no guards, but those of heaven. I live in the midst of enemies
who have legal power to kill me every hour. But this is the way in which I
comfort myself: I
know that Christ is Lord of all; and that the Father hath put all things under
His feet, among the rest, the wrath of the emperor and of all evil spirits. If
it please Christ that I should be slain, let me die in His name. If it do not
please Him, who shall slay me?
Definition of faith
Phillips Brooks gave a definition of faith so true and helpful to
sinners needing salvation, that I reproduce it. “Forsaking All, I Take Him.” It
will be noticed that the initial letters spell “Faith”; and what I want you to
do to-night is to “forsake all and take Him.” It would be a good thing if every
one present were to write on the fly-leaf of their Bibles those beautiful
words, “Forsaking all, I take Him.” (W. R. Bradlaugh.)
The hand of our God is
upon all them for good that seek Him: but He power and His wrath is against all
them that forsake Him.
Contrasts
I. A contrast of
human character.
II. A contrast of
divine treatment. Conclusion--
1. How solemnly man’s destiny is in his own hands, or, more
correctly, in his own choice. “Deeds axe destiny; character is fate.”
2. In this world character may be changed (Hosea 14:1-2; Hosea 14:4). (William Jones.)
Seeking the Lord, and its advantages
We are directed--
I. To seeking God
and its advantages.
1. Seeking God denotes--
2. The advantages to those who thus seek Him. “The hand of our God is
upon all,” etc. The hand of His--
II. Forsaking god
and its attendant evils. Learn--
1. The value of true religion.
2. The awfulness of apostasy.
3. The necessity of both vigilance and perseverance (Hebrews 3:12; Hebrews 4:10-13). (Jabez Burns, D. D.)
Verses 24-30
And weighed unto them the silver and the gold, and the vessels.
The guardianship of the sacred treasures
I. The treasures
to be guarded.
1. Valuable in themselves.
2. Valuable as being consecrated to God.
3. Valuable as being the spontaneous gifts of friends and well
wishers.
II. The guardians
of the treasures.
III. The charge to
the guardians of the treasures.
IV. The acceptance
of the guardianship of the treasures. Conclusion--
1. Our subject speaks to ministers of the gospel (1 Corinthians 4:1-2; Titus 1:7; Titus 1:9; 1 Timothy 6:20; 2 Timothy 1:14).
2. To all who have charge of public funds or the property of others.
3. To all men (Matthew 25:14-30). (William Jones.)
The charge of the pilgrim priests
Without being unduly fanciful, I think I may venture to take these
words as a type of the injunctions which are given to us Christian people, and
to see in them a picturesque representation of the duties that devolve upon us
in the course of our journey across the desert to the temple-home above.
I. Consider: the precious treasure
entrusted to our keeping.
1. The treasure is first our own selves, with all that we are and may
be under the humiliating and quickening influence of His grace and spirit. That
which we carry with us--the infinite possibilities of these awful spirits of
ours, the tremendous faculties which are given to every human soul, and which,
like a candle plunged into oxygen, are meant to burn far more brightly under
the stimulus of Christian faith and the possession of God’s truth, are the rich
deposit committed to our charge. The precious treasure of our own natures, our
own hearts, our own understandings, wills, consciences, desires--keep these
until they are weighed in the house of the Lord at Jerusalem.
2. The treasure is next--This great word of salvation, once delivered
to the saints, and to be handed on without diminution or alteration to the
generations that are to come. Possession involves responsibility always. The
word of salvation is given to us. If we go tampering with it, by erroneous
apprehension, by unfair usage, by failing to apply it to our own daily life,
then it will fade and disappear from our grasp. It is given to us in order that
we may keep it safe, and carry it high up across the desert as becomes the
priests of the most high God.
II. Next, the
command, the guardianship that is here set forth. Watch ye and keep them. That
is to say, Watch in order that ye may keep. This involves--
1. Unslumbering vigilance.
2. Lowly trust.
3. Punctilious purity.
It was fitting that the priests should carry the things that
belonged to the temple. No other hands but consecrated hands had a right to
touch them. To none other guardianship but the guardianship of the possessors
of a symbolic and ceremonial purity could the vessels of a symbolic and
ceremonial worship be entrusted; and to none others but the possessors of real
and spiritual holiness can the treasures of the true temple, of an inward and
spiritual worship be entrusted, “Be ye clean that bear the vessels of the
Lord,” said Isaiah long after. The only way to keep our treasure undiminished
and untarnished, is to keep ourselves pure and clean.
4. Constant use of the treasure. Although the vessels borne through
the desert by those priests were used for no service during the march, they
weighed just the same when they got to the end as at the beginning. But if we
do not use the vessels that are entrusted to our care they will not weigh the
same. There never was an unused talent yet, but when it was taken out and put
into the scales it was lighter than when it was committed to the keeping of the
earth. Gifts that are used fructify. Capacities that are strained to the
uttermost increase. Service strengthens the power of service; and just as the
reward of work is more work, the way for making ourselves fit for bigger things
is to do the things that are lying by us. The blacksmith’s arm, the sailor’s
eye, the organs of any piece of handicraft, as we all know, are strengthened by
exercise, and so it is in the higher region.
III. The weighing in
the house of the Lord. Though it cannot be that we shall meet the trial and the
weighing of that day without many a flaw and much loss, yet we may hope that by
His precious help and His pitying acceptance we may lay ourselves down in peace
at last, saying, “I have kept the faith,” and may be awakened by the word “Well
done, good and faithful servant.” (A. Maclaren, D. D.)
From Ahava to Jerusalem
This illustrates the pilgrimage of the Christian.
I. The setting out
from ahava.
1. From captivity to liberty.
2. From exile to their ancestral home.
3. From the land of idolatry to the scene of true worship.
II. The progress on
the journey.
III. The arrival at
jerusalem. This
was characterised by--
1. Grateful rest.
2. Joyful welcome. (William Jones.)
.
Verse 28
For I was ashamed to require of the king a band of soldiers.
Ezra’s confidence in God
I. Confidence in
God avowed.
1. In His providence.
2. In His providence as efficiently promoting the interests of His
people.
3. In His providence as opposed to those who forsake Him.
II. Confidence in
God tested.
1. By their need of guidance.
2. By their need of protection.
III. Confidence in
god maintained.
1. In not seeking guidance and defence from the king.
2. In seeking guidance and defence from God.
IV. Confidence in
god vindicated.
1. In their inward assurance.
2. In the outward result. (William Jones.)
Ezra and his times
I. Ezra’s language
was in striking contrast with the general state of opinion around him. He knew
he was right, and could afford to be singular. At particular crises of public
opinion it devolves upon some men to go into the land of the enemy, that they
may bring truth out of captivity. Such men have no ultimate fear for truth;
they know its vitality. Such men never change sides. The world wonders at their
eccentricity, and recommends them to beg or borrow a band of soldiers and
horsemen to assist them in their progress; but they are ashamed to think of
such a thing. If they could make truth successful to-morrow they must do it
with truth’s weapons and her weapons only; but they cannot advance the
liberation of truth by any unworthy means, or by any unnatural alliance.
II. Ezra’s
situation afforded him an opportunity for asserting this great principle under
very trying circumstances. Christ’s whole life illustrates Ezra’s principle of
confidence in God under circumstances of great temptation. (W. G. Barrett.)
Ezra an example in business
I. His
humiliation.
II. His faith.
III. His prayer.
IV. His holy
jealousy.
V. His success. (R.
Cecil.)
Heroic faith
Our text gives us a glimpse of high-toned faith, and a
noble strain of feeling. Ezra knew that he had but to ask and have an escort
from the king that would ensure their safety till they saw Jerusalem. It took
some strength of principle to abstain from asking what it would have been so
natural to ask, so easy to get, so comfortable to have. The symbolic phrase
“the hand of our God,” as expressive of the Divine protection, occurs with
remarkable frequency in the books of Ezra and Nehemiah, and though not peculiar
to them, is yet strikingly characteristic of them. It has a certain beauty and
force of its own. The hand is, of course, the seat of active power. It is on or
over a man like some great shield held aloft above him, below which there is
safe hiding. So that great hand bends itself over us, and we are secure beneath its
hollow. As a child sometimes carries a tender-winged butterfly in the globe of
its two hands, that the bloom on its wings may not be ruffled by its
fluttering, so He carries our feeble, enamoured souls enclosed in the covert of
His almighty hand. As a father may lay his own large muscular hand on his
child’s tiny fingers to help him, or as “Elisha put his hands on the king’s
hands,” that the contact might strengthen him to shoot the arrow of the Lord’s
deliverance, so the hand of our God is upon us to impart power as well as
protection; and “our bow abides in strength” when “the arms of our hands are
made strong by the hands of the mighty God of Jacob.” That was Ezra’s faith,
and that should be ours. Note Ezra’s sensitive shrinking from anything like
inconsistency between his creed and his practice, and we may well learn this
lesson--to be true to our professed principles; to beware of making our
religion a matter of words; to live, when the time for putting them into
practice comes, by the maxims which we have been forward to proclaim when there
was no risk of applying them; and to try sometimes to look at our lives with
the eyes of people who do not share our faith, that we may bring our actions up
to the mark of what they expect of us. Especially in regard to this matter of
trust in an unseen hand, and reliance on visible helps, we all need to be very rigid
in our self-inspection. Faith in the good hand of God upon us for good should
often lead to the abandonment, and always to the subordination, of material
aids. Each man must settle for himself when abandonment or subordination is his
duty. We ought to work into our lives the principle that the absolute surrender
and forsaking of external helps and goods is sometimes essential to the
preservation and due expression of reliance on God. What shall we say of people
who profess that God is their portion and are as eager in the scramble for
money as anybody? What kind of commentary? Will sharp-sighted, sharp-tongued
observers have a right to make on us, whose creed is so unlike theirs, while
our lives are identical? Do you believe that “the hand of our God is upon all
them for good that seek Him”? Then do you not think that racing after the
prizes of this world, with flushed cheek and labouring breath, or longing, with
a gnawing hunger of heart, for any earthly good, or lamenting over the removal
of creaturely defences and joys, as if heaven were empty because some one’s
place here is, or as if God were dead because dear ones die, may well be a
shame to us, and a taunt on the lips of our enemies? Note further that his
faith not only
impels him to the renunciation of the Babylonian guard, but to earnest
supplication for the defence in which he is so confident. So for us the
condition and preparation on and by which we are sheltered by that great hand
is the faith that asks and the asking of faith. We make God responsible for our
safety when we abandon other defence and commit ourselves to Him. He will accept
the trust and set His guards about us. So our story ends with the triumphant
vindication of this Quixotic faith: “The hand of our God was upon us, and He delivered us
from the hand of the enemy, and of such as lay in wait by the way; and we came
to Jerusalem.” The ventures of faith are ever rewarded. When we come to tell
the completed story of our lives, we shall have to record the fulfilment of all
God’s promises, and the accomplishment of all our prayers that were built on
these. (A. Maclaren, D. D.)
Fear of inconsistency
I. Ezra’s
conviction.
1. He was convinced that there were some men who sought God, and
others who forsook Him. There were some who sought--
But there were others who cared for none of these things. So it is
still. There are some who read the Bible and listen to the gospel with an
earnest desire to know God, and who feel that to have God for their friend is
to have the business of life accomplished; while there are others who turn a
deaf ear to the invitations of Divine love, and who never seriously ask
regarding the requirements of the law of God. The conviction of Ezra is that of
every thoughtful good man. There is also the further conviction that this is
the grand distinction. He who thinks of one neighbour being a seeker of God,
and another a forsaker of God, looks at a distinction of the soul, and one
which will prove lasting and important as the soul itself.
2. Ezra was convinced that God’s hand for good was on the one class, and that His
power and wrath were against the other.
Sloth and intemperance and profligacy lead to ruin, while
diligence and sobriety lead to respectability and competence.
3. Ezra was convinced that he and his companions were among those who
sought God, and on whom God’s hand was for good. He calls Jehovah “our Lord.”
His language was intended to convey that they were in a state of favour with
God, and that they knew this. From this we learn that a man may assure himself
of God’s friendship.
II. Ezra’s
declaration of his conviction. This declaration was probably made when he
requested authority to make his proposed journey to Jerusalem, At such a time
he would feel under peculiar obligation to declare his belief in God, and his
hope that Jehovah was his own Father, Protector, and Guide. This obligation
every good man ought to feel. Christ requires us to confess Him. Such a
profession is made by the observance of outward and positive institutions. When
a man calls his family around him, sings a song of praise, and reads a portion
of Scripture, and presents an offering of supplication and thanksgiving, he is
telling his children and neighbours that he is a disciple of Jesus Christ. When
he engages in the exercises of public worship, and especially when he takes his
place at the communion-table, he is making an open and decided declaration that
he is a disciple of Jesus.
III. Ezra’s anxiety
lest he should do anything inconsistent with this declaration. Two instructive
points require to be looked at.
1. There was real and great danger.
2. The inconsistency from which he shrank was more apparent than
real. A good man believes that God renews the face of the earth, and covers the
valleys with corn, but he does not neglect to plough and sow; he believes that
God is a refuge and a strength, a sun and a shield, yet he takes food when he
is hungry and medicine when he is sick; he does not expect that God is to
protect and bless him apart from such means as prudence and experience may
dictate. If Ezra had asked for a guard of soldiers, the request would not have
been inconsistent with confidence in the power and faithfulness of God, but it
would probably have appeared so to the king and his nobles, and he feared lest
in this way the character of God should suffer. Things which are in themselves
lawful are at times inexpedient, and a Christian man by doing such things may
greatly injure both his comfort and usefulness. A. sacrifice of principle and a
wise consideration of times and circumstances are very different things, and to
confound them shows only ignorance and folly. (J. B. Johnston, D. D.)
The good hand of God
It is a glimpse into a spiritual history which our text here
presents to us. Of Ezra himself we have but a vague and shadowy idea; he has
long since passed to the realm where storms and struggles are ended, and the
mystery of life gives place to the clear sunlight of God’s love. But within
that strong, devout soul a great struggle was once fought out. The anxious
questioning of his troubled and perplexed spirit was real enough then. And
while it is possible to miss the true lesson and to push the teaching to a
dangerous extreme, it will, if we penetrate to the spirit of the story, supply
an answer to a modern problem and a truth fruitful for our modern lives. Ezra
sought to satisfy the old equation between the Divine power and the human
agency. He put to himself the familiar question--Is the use of means any the
less a trusting in God? may not the means fall within the compass of God’s plan
of deliverance? And the issue of the struggle was this: at every hazard he must stand right with
God and with his own heart, and therefore he refused to resort to an arm of
flesh at all. We appear to have here a plain and blank refusal to use means.
Some would have said--“Surely we may trust in the good hand of God, and the
soldiers of the king.” But to Ezra’s scrupulous faith it presented an
alternative. One or the other but not both. One or the other he must elect to
have. He refused, not only because of the nature of the instrument, but also
because it was an instrument. He said in effect, “Both we and our enemies are
in the hands of God; it is His work, therefore, and not ours, to secure our
safety and our welfare.” Let us not suppose that we have here a unique instance
of complete trust in God. It was when Jacob saw no human way of escape, and God
had showed him his utter helplessness, that he went forth with a calm face and
a brave heart to meet his brother Esau. It was when the horsemen were hard upon
the children of Israel that the Lord began to trouble the Egyptians. There is
nothing grander in this Book than the calm tramp of Moses on through the
wilderness, with no attempt at self-defence, only the simple assurance, “The
Lord shall fight for you, and ye shall hold your peace.” Let me remind you of
the boy who went to meet the mightiest of living warriors with a sling and a
stone. Perhaps there were some who said, “Surely you can trust in God and put
on the armour of Saul as well.” But David felt that the armour was unnecessary
if he had the shield of God’s power. In all these examples we find a faith which rested in God
and not in means of deliverance. We may find it hard to understand Ezra,
because our Christian character is often composed of one part of faith and
ninety-nine parts of common sense, while his contained ninety-nine parts of faith and one
part common sense. We trust in God, but feel safer if the mail-clad warriors
are at our side; we know the twelve legions of angels are around us, but we are
glad to feel the two swords concealed beneath our cloaks; we believe that the
manna will fall day by day, yet we like to take bread with us lest it should
fail to come. At the same time it is important to observe that it is the spirit
of this incident we are to copy and not the form. As an instance of the
rejection of means it is not an instance for all times and for all circumstances. Our
Lord Himself taught us not to trust in God to do that which we may do for
ourselves. The jars of water at Cane, the net cast into the sea, and the stone
rolled away from the sepulchre, teach us that God will work through earthly
instruments. But we maintain that failure oftener results from trusting in the
means more than in God than from trusting in God and not in means. It i| the
deepest truth for the Christian worker that our churches, our ministrations,
our methods, are but channels for the grace of God. We want not so much the
eloquent tongue as the bended knee; not so much the crowded church as the crowded prayer
meeting; not so much the beautiful temple as the glory of the Lord within. The
great need now is not for better and more perfect machinery, but for a more
consecrated spiritual life, and for a profounder trust in God, who can work
with or without our machinery. It is, moreover, the secret of peace for the
Christian life. But further, not only had Ezra the earnest longing to be right
with God, but also to seem right. He was unwilling to put any stumbling-block
in the way of the king. Though Artaxerxes might grant the request, might it not
lessen his conception of the goodness and power of God? This age, which more
than any other demands reality in its religion, demands the most careful
seeming also. Tell men that we are pilgrims, and then let them see us making
our habitations here; tell them that we are laying up the incorruptible riches,
and then let them see us intent on the corruptible gain; tell them our
confidence is in God,
and then let them see us as hard in sorrow, as cynical in disappointment, as
unbelieving in distress as themselves; tell them that we live for the unseen
and the eternal, and then let them mark us caring for nothing we cannot see and
clutch with our fingers; tell them that we confess a higher allegiance, and bow
before a higher will, and then let them see us conforming our lives to their
cold, worldly maxims, and we may say what we will, but they will treasure up
our words as among the hollow falsities of a false creed. Let us be on our
guard not to offend a watching world by the broad gulf between the spoken word
and the visible life. (J. H. Shakespeare, M. A.)
Faith and prudence
Ezra felt what Christian people still often feel, the conflict
between prudence and faith. We observe--
I. That as a grand
rule in the Christian life faith and prudence must go together. The Scriptures
give no countenance to presumptuous reliance on supernatural intervention. As a
rule of life they bind us to take all human precautions against the various
forms of mischief we have reason to apprehend. In this unbelieving generation
there is not much reason to speak against excessive faith, but there is some
reason. The workman gave as his reason for not going to church, “That religious
people were hypocrites because they called the temple God’s house, and yet put
upon it a lightning rod.” This worldly workman could not see that God’s Church ought
to recognise God’s law, and act agreeably thereto; but he thought that he saw a
glaring contradiction in this union of prudence and piety. And some noble men
in the Church sympathise with this workman, and reject the securities which
prudence would counsel. They have no faith in the band of soldiers. They leave
their property uninsured; in times of disturbance they will not claim the
protection of the magistrate; and in times of sickness they will not call the
physician. That is, to a large extent, a serious mistake. As a rule we are to
accept the band of soldiers which Ezra, in peculiar circumstances, rejected. We
must not rashly cast ourselves into peril on the idea that angels have charge
concerning us. We must not tempt the Lord our God. If devout men do not attend
to the dictates of prudence they must suffer for it; and not only so, but they
injure Christianity likewise. The truth of religion is based on false issues,
and thus brought into suspicion or contempt. As the rule of life we must march through
the desert with the hand of soldiers. Our religion is not fatalism. “The good
man guideth his affairs with discretion.” Yet there are times--
II. When faith in
God must supersede the provisions of ordinary prudence. When faith and prudence
gave different counsel, Ezra chose to walk by faith, and we must all feel that
he did right. The question is: When are we to go beyond merely prudential
considerations and venture all on the unseen power of God? When are we
justified in neglecting policy and appealing to the higher law? We are “shut
up” to “faith” when--
1. Prudential action would most probably be construed as a denial of
the Divine government. Ezra had told the king that “the hand of God was upon
all them for good who feared Him,” And now he considered that to reveal any
anxiety for a guard of soldiers would appear to the heathen king like a
practical denial of the overshadowing providence of Jehovah. On this ground he
elected to brave the perils of the wilderness without the military escort. A
band of soldiers would have hidden the Shepherd of Israel, Artaxerxes alone
would have been seen; and so Ezra, with a fine spiritual instinct, saw the hour
for simple trust had come, and by declining the soldiers left open the full
view of God and His gracious and glorious government. A line of action is
marked here for ourselves. To remove the scruples of the few we are not to take
the lightning conductors from our temples and essay similar reformations; but
we must seek so to act that we satisfy the world generally that we do believe
in the Divine
superintendence and care. A worldly man believes only in the band of soldiers;
and to let him know that we believe in something beyond we must sometimes be
Willing to act without the soldiers altogether. Are we not too anxious about
material helps end visible securities? Has not the Church, by clinging so
feverishly to visible resources and helps and defenders, given some sanction to
the world’s unbelief? Ezra blushed to ask Artaxerxes for help that might seem a
denial of the power and presence of God. Are we sufficiently sensitive on this
matter? Trapp says, “It is the ingenuity of saints to study God’s ends more
than their own.” And if we are very jealous for the honour of God, and seek to
uphold His government in the eyes of the world, we shall sometimes be ready to
imperil our personal interest and safety for His sake; and let us be assured
that when we act in this lofty spirit of faith and self-forgetfulness, we shall
not be confounded. When--
2. Prudential action would cause us to lean on worldly associations
and resources. Artaxerxes was an idolater, and Ezra was anxious not to ask too
much at his
hands. It seemed inconsistent to Ezra that he should be soliciting a band of
pagan soldiers to protect God’s people and the treasures of God’s temple.
Policy drove him to find assistance in a suspicious quarter, and so he retired
to the higher ground of simple trust in God. Here again we have a line of
action marked out for us. We are the confessed servants of the Holy One of
Israel, and prudence must not lead us to worldly alliances and dependence upon
sinful circles. In our personal life we must observe this. We must beware of
compromises with the world for the sake of our personal safety and
aggrandisement. And in regard to God’s Church we must observe this. Policy
would often direct us to expect great things from the greatness, wealth, or
wisdom of unregenerate men for the Church’s sake. So far from seeking their
assistance, we ought to be shy of their gold and their patronage. Thus did
Ezra. And thus acted Paul and Silas (Acts 16:16-19). When prudence would lead
us to seek for much, either for ourselves or for the Church, at the hands of
unbelieving men, we must pause and follow the path faith indicates. Let us dare
anything, suffer anything, rather than compromise our own character and the
character of God in the eyes of the world by linking our fortunes and the
fortunes of the Church with those who are joined to idols. When--
3. Prudential action might embarrass the progress of God’s kingdom.
If Artaxerxes had detected any inconsistency in Ezra he might have ceased to be
favourable to his cause and have prevented or delayed the return to Jerusalem.
Rather than endanger the popularity and progress of the cause of God, Ezra was
prepared to run great risks. Here another line of action is marked out for us.
If prudence would circumscribe, fetter, or destroy the work of God, the time
has come to appeal to loftier considerations. Calculating, cautious piety would
condemn the act of Ezra as imprudent; but many imprudent things have been done
or there would not have been so much Christianity in the world as there is; and
many more imprudent things will have to be done before Christianity fills the
world. Let us remember that God’s kingdom is a supernatural one, and in its
promotion we must often act with a boldness which could not be justified in the
court of prudence. There is a holy venturesomeness in evangelisation which
carries with it a far higher guarantee of success than do the pondered schemes
of a rationalising statesmanship. Thus, then, there are times when we must
renounce the counsellings of worldly wisdom and, stepping boldly into the
darkness, cry with Ezra, “Help us, O Lord our God, for we rest on Thee.”
III. The separation
of faith from prudence must be effected only in the spirit of sincere and
earnest dependence upon heaven (verse 23). No precipitancy, no levity, no
presumption. By fasting and prayer they obtained the assurance that God would
honour their faith and preserve them. Not lightly must we discard ordinary
defences and helps. When we can do no other we must humbly, solemnly rest
ourselves in the hands of God. The times come to us all when faith and policy
give contradictory counsel. When such times come let us not be found wanting to
our profession and our God. In many circumstances simple trust in God will
prove to be the truest policy. In Hebrews 11:7 Noah’s conduct in preparing
the ark is spoken of as “prudence.” “By his believing obedience he came to be
at last the one who was truly prudent. A truth of great practical importance.
He who like a child blindly follows the will of God, regardless of all
consequences, is the one who is truly prudent, for he builds on the Eternal,
and He will never allow His own to come to shame.”--Ebrard. And on the
contrary, policy leading God’s people to rest on worldly men and means and measures,
finally demoralises and betrays them (Isaiah 31:3). (W. L. Watkinson.)
Alliance with God
We are like William of Orange, with a few followers and an empty
purse, making war against the master of half the world, with the mines of Peru
for a treasury. But like William, too, when questioned concerning our
resources, we can reply, “Before we took up this cause we entered into a close
alliance with the King of Kings.” Those on the Lord’s side are on the winning
side. He never has, and never will, lose a battle. (David Gracey.)
God’s protection
Pastor Oncken was forbidden by the burgomaster of Hamburg from
holding religious meetings. “Do you see that little finger?” said the
burgomaster; “as long as I can move that finger, so long will I put down the
Baptists.” “Yes,” said Oncken, “I see your little finger, and I see also the
great arm of God; and whilst that arm is lifted on our behalf, your little
finger will have little terror for us.
Want of faith in God manifested
Mr. G. J. Holyoake, in his “Sixty Years of an Agitator’s Life,”
gives an interesting account of the Zulus who converted Bishop Colenso. Robert
Ryder, a secular carpenter, was employed by the bishop to build his church and
school-house in Natal. Ryder sent Mr. Holyoake several photographs of the
actual Zulus who accomplished the conversion, long before the change was heard
of in England. The Zulu workers under Ryder were conversed with by the bishop
daily. They were remarkably shrewd in argument. They remarked upon the fact
that the bishop had a room built in the rear of his church, in which he stored
an eighteen-pounder. They knew what that cannon was for, and they thought that
the bishop, fair-spoken as he was, did not place his ultimate reliance on the
“Good Father,” in whom he told them to trust.
Faith in God
A century ago William Carey entered Nottingham with the
thought in his heart, from which he preached the following day in a sermon
which really originated the Baptist Missionary Society: “Expect great things from God. Attempt
great things for God.” It was a very simple thing. It was very memorable. It
was one of those inspirations that illumine as by a single flash the whole
realm of thought. “Expect great things from God.” Looking back over a hundred
years, it was interesting to note upon what Carey based his expectations. Not
on human resources, not on wealth, not on eloquence. Those few men who gathered
together at Kettering had no worldly backing. They were obscure men in the
extreme. With scarcely an exception they were quite unknown outside their own
immediate neighbourhood. The wise and prudent in the Christian world doomed the
enterprise to ignominious failure. With one exception, there was not a man of
any mark in London who would have anything to do with it, and when a meeting
was held to consider the advisability of forming an auxiliary, the idea was
negatived by an overwhelming majority. But Carey believed in God. Doubts,
unlikelihoods, impossibilities, vanished from his mind. And what has been the
result of this faith? During the last hundred years, wherever the missionary
had gone God had given testimony to the word of His grace by signs and wonders
as marvellous as miracle. As in no former age the world lay open, aye, and
opened-minded to the Gospel. (J. Culross.)
Fearlessness of the godly
“I go up alone,” General Gordon wrote, as he started from
Cairo to Khartoum, “with an Infinite Almighty God to direct and guide me; and I
am so called to trust in Him as to fear nothing, and, indeed, to feel sure of
success.”
A lesson of faith
I was passing one of the busiest spots in the City of
London, opposite the Royal Exchange. Here numerous turnings meet, and pour
their mighty burden of vehicular traffic in bewildering streams. As the cabs,
carriages, carts and waggons hastened along I could not help thinking what need
there was for care in crossing, and how dangerous at that busy hour a false
step would be. With such thoughts, nay attention was attracted by something
that seemed entirely out of harmony with the whole surroundings. Right in the midst of the
danger, at a time when the traffic was most bewildering, I saw a woman crossing
the street. She was pushing a perambulator, not eagerly or excitedly trying to
reach the other side, but with perfect calmness, and apparently without fear.
What was the explanation? A City policeman held her arm, and she relied upon
him. And shall we not place the same confidence in our Guide, and though
dangers and difficulties, and trials and temptations surround us, shall we not
trust Him perfectly who is able to keep us from falling, and to present us,
faultless before the presence of His glory with exceeding joy? Shall we not
disdain to fear, knowing that we are protected and sustained by the everlasting
arm? (Signal.)
Luther’s courage
Luther’s words in the first struggles of his public ministry have
the sacred anxiety, the solemn confidence, and almost the language, of the
apostle: “I am
compassed with no guards, but those of heaven. I live in the midst of enemies
who have legal power to kill me every hour. But this is the way in which I
comfort myself: I
know that Christ is Lord of all; and that the Father hath put all things under
His feet, among the rest, the wrath of the emperor and of all evil spirits. If
it please Christ that I should be slain, let me die in His name. If it do not
please Him, who shall slay me?
Definition of faith
Phillips Brooks gave a definition of faith so true and helpful to
sinners needing salvation, that I reproduce it. “Forsaking All, I Take Him.” It
will be noticed that the initial letters spell “Faith”; and what I want you to
do to-night is to “forsake all and take Him.” It would be a good thing if every
one present were to write on the fly-leaf of their Bibles those beautiful
words, “Forsaking all, I take Him.” (W. R. Bradlaugh.)
The hand of our God is
upon all them for good that seek Him: but He power and His wrath is against all
them that forsake Him.
Contrasts
I. A contrast of
human character.
II. A contrast of
divine treatment. Conclusion--
1. How solemnly man’s destiny is in his own hands, or, more
correctly, in his own choice. “Deeds axe destiny; character is fate.”
2. In this world character may be changed (Hosea 14:1-2; Hosea 14:4). (William Jones.)
Seeking the Lord, and its advantages
We are directed--
I. To seeking God
and its advantages.
1. Seeking God denotes--
2. The advantages to those who thus seek Him. “The hand of our God is
upon all,” etc. The hand of His--
II. Forsaking god
and its attendant evils. Learn--
1. The value of true religion.
2. The awfulness of apostasy.
3. The necessity of both vigilance and perseverance (Hebrews 3:12; Hebrews 4:10-13). (Jabez Burns, D. D.)
──《The Biblical Illustrator》